Vaping is a Mimic Act of Smoking? I don't agree!!!
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Vaping is a Mimic Act of Smoking? I don't agree!!!

  1. #1
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    672

    Default Vaping is a Mimic Act of Smoking? I don't agree!!!

    Guys & Gals, I need your Advise and guidance. For most of here us who have vaped or Currently Vaping, Do you agree with this Sentence? E-Cig / PVs / Vaping are a mimic act of Smoking.

    I don't agree but i still think that we are not even mimic(ing) as Vaping is a new era of Tobacco smokes.
    In the Past, People are unable to understands the tobacco Harms and they are unable to even create extracts of nicotine. Now we are in the 21st Century. E-cig came along using nicotine in liquids form but why are the Government so negative in accepting the fact that this is more healthier?
    Icon likes this.

  2. #2
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    595

    Default

    I actually do agree -- the similarities are too strong and not accidental. People treasure their clouds and throat hit, which they want because it's like smoking. If it was solely about nicotine delivery, then the patch works better in many ways.

    That said, I don't see that it matters. I know some legislation & lobbying brings it up as if that were an additional reason that it should be banned, but I don't see how that argument fits in with a real public health issue. I think we should push back in that manner: so what if it looks like smoking? It doesn't offer anywhere near the same health risks for the vaper, and completely eliminates any problem with shs. Its appearance is irrelevant.
    Katatawnic, Lopaka79 and Commie like this.

  3. #3
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Hacienda Heights, CA
    Posts
    289

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zal42 View Post
    I actually do agree -- the similarities are too strong and not accidental. People treasure their clouds and throat hit, which they want because it's like smoking. If it was solely about nicotine delivery, then the patch works better in many ways.

    That said, I don't see that it matters. I know some legislation & lobbying brings it up as if that were an additional reason that it should be banned, but I don't see how that argument fits in with a real public health issue. I think we should push back in that manner: so what if it looks like smoking? It doesn't offer anywhere near the same health risks for the vaper, and completely eliminates any problem with shs. Its appearance is irrelevant.
    that's what i was gonna say

  4. #4
    jj2
    jj2 is offline
    Tigger Girl Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    jj2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hundred Acre Wood
    Posts
    174,736

    Default

    Well said Zal42......................



  5. #5
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    672

    Default

    I think most government find 1001 reason to put up a ban of e-cig.
    To me, I think so what if it look like smoking, isn't the analog tobacco already on the market? The device in which we think is a creation to mimic tobacco analog at first but over the years till now, people are getting mods. And people can even vape non-nicotine. They serious don't even think positive on this but simply allow sales of tobacco. As is the number 1 income of most country.

  6. #6
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    499

    Default

    Not only the TH and the vapor clouds, but e cigs give smokers the similarity of oral fixation, and wanting to use their hands. A patch on your arm might deliver nicotine, but it is far to passive. Smoking is as much of a psychological addiction as it is a physical one. So, vaping is very much a mimic of smoking. That's probably why those that vape can quit smoking analogs instantly, whereas even the patch and gum which deliver nicotine fail more often and people continue to smoke even when using them. It's probably also why vaping is never going to be as much of a smoking cessation method as much as it is an alternative nicotine delivery system.

    The fact that carcinogens in vaping are 1/300th (at most) what are found in tobacco products, alone is enough to say "who cares if it looks and feels like smoking, who cares if it is an alternative and not a quit-smoking product, and WHO CARES WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK" The fact that you are putting an absorbable vapor into your lungs, and not small suit particles (the worst kind of air pollution imaginable), makes it even more "healthy" compared to smoking. Nevermind the hundreds of other chemicals.

    The reason smoking needed to be banned in public facilities is because it was an affront to the health of those not doing it. Vaping isn't, and it is much healthier to the actual user. I'm glad it mimics smoking. When I think of vaping I think of the caterpillar in Alice in Wonderland, and how, back when smoking was acceptable, it was OK to have a cartoon character in a children's movie puffing away on a hookah. In an ideal world people could enjoy smoking nearly guilt free. But the world is not ideal, and smoke in the lungs is one of the greatest health threats man has ever known.

    Vaping on the other hand is about as close as that guilt-free smokers vision as is possible. With or without nicotine there is something alluring about the sight, smell, and taste of vapor clouds, which for all intents and purposes do mimic smoke.

    Vaping does not mimic smoking 100%, but it is damn close. The few things it doesn't offer aren't missed by former smokers anyway. Smelly breath, smelly clothes, dirty ashtrays, burns in clothing, carpets, furniture, and skin, cigarette butts overflowing ashtrays and trashcans and littering yards and decks and porches and car floors.
    Last edited by jlarsen; 03-10-2011 at 06:23 PM.

  7. #7
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    ctourtelot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    I agree. It's the fact that it does mimic smoking that it works so well to replace it.

  8. #8
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    672

    Default

    Thanks for the advise, after all is mimic still a winning point truely. Iquid smoking because of the mouth hand action and the puff out vapor.

  9. #9
    CASAA Activist Vaping Advocate
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Vocalek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, VA
    Posts
    7,161
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Root beer comes in brown bottles like beer. When you pour root beer into a glass it foams up like beer. We do not outlaw root beer because it looks like beer.

    Smoke is not dangerous because of how it looks, smoke is dangerous because of what it is.

    Root beer is not beer.
    Vapor is not smoke.


    ----
    Support CASAA -http://www.casaa.org/Donate_LKWE.html ---

  10. #10
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Central Illinois - USA
    Posts
    1,232

    Default

    It absolutely mimics the actions of smoking. However, that alone is not sufficient reason to ban it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks