Closed Thread
Page 222 of 641 FirstFirst ... 122172212218219220221222223224225226232272322 ... LastLast
Results 2,211 to 2,220 of 6407
Smoking Everywhere V. FDA Daily Docket Sheet Update--APPEAL's COURT ISSUES STAY in Electronic Cigarette News; Originally Posted by trs-80 I understand the fda can regulate tobacco. That older finding states in the index that it ...
  1. #2211
    ECF Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trs-80 View Post
    I understand the fda can regulate tobacco. That older finding states in the index that it doesn't matter what similar devices are on the market, how they are constructed, what users use it for , what lower employees say , but what is the manufacturers intent. I have syringes for injecting epoxy into fiber optic cable connectors that could be used by drug addicts though that is not the manufacturers intent. paraphrasing SE "we want them to use our product as long as they used cigarettes' Do you think we have a chance that they will be deemed some form of tobacco product ? Maybe wishful thinking.

    TS--It is within the Judge's preview to decide what the intended use is that he is going to apply and what catagory he is going to place the e-cig in. Judge Leon really only has to conclude that the e-cig is in or not in the jusrisdiction of the FDA. That really is the issue here.


    Sun

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2212
    Full Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sun Vaporer View Post
    TS--It is within the Judge's preview to decide what the intended use is that he is going to apply and what catagory he is going to place the e-cig in. Judge Leon really only has to conclude that the e-cig is in or not in the jusrisdiction of the FDA. That really is the issue here.


    Sun
    Did you mean "is not within .. " ?

  4. #2213
    ECF Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cityboy View Post
    Did you mean "is not within .. " ?

    City--either the FDA has jurisdiction or it does not---it is black or white.


    Sun

  5. #2214
    Senior Member ECF Veteran LoneRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    227

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cityboy View Post
    Did you mean "is not within .. " ?
    I was going to ask the same
    thought he left out the word- not-

    Sun,Judge Leon can decide intended use and catagory to place e cig in?
    Last edited by LoneRanger; 10-16-2009 at 09:27 PM.

  6. #2215
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran lotus14's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Posts
    1,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sun Vaporer View Post
    City--either the FDA has jurisdiction or it does not---it is black or white.
    Sun
    Sun--

    Now I'm confused.

    I thought SE/NJOY were arguing that their products are tobacco products. The new legislation specifically gives the FDA jurisdiction over these products.

    The only issue I see that is left is whether the FDA can regulate e-cigs as drug device combos, or must follow the guidelines in the legislation for tobacco products.

    Didn't congress give them jurisdiction either way? How can they not have jurisdiction?

  7. #2216
    Accessories Supplier ECF Veteran kristin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    CASAA Board of Directors - Wisconsin
    Posts
    6,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lotus14 View Post
    Sun--

    Now I'm confused.

    I thought SE/NJOY were arguing that their products are tobacco products. The new legislation specifically gives the FDA jurisdiction over these products.

    The only issue I see that is left is whether the FDA can regulate e-cigs as drug device combos, or must follow the guidelines in the legislation for tobacco products.

    Didn't congress give them jurisdiction either way? How can they not have jurisdiction?
    If my understanding is correct, if they are ruled a tobacco product, then the FDA cannot ban them outright, they can only regulate them. If it's ruled a medical device, the FDA has even more control.

  8. #2217
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran lotus14's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Columbia SC
    Posts
    1,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kristin View Post
    If my understanding is correct, if they are ruled a tobacco product, then the FDA cannot ban them outright, they can only regulate them. If it's ruled a medical device, the FDA has even more control.
    Yes, that is my understanding also. Either way the FDA has jurisdiction, it's a matter of which guidelines they have to follow.

  9. #2218
    Super Member ECF Veteran Bryn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Arkansas, USA
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kristin View Post
    If my understanding is correct, if they are ruled a tobacco product, then the FDA cannot ban them outright, they can only regulate them. If it's ruled a medical device, the FDA has even more control.
    Yes, this is what I understand. I am wanting the Judge to rule it a tobacco product. Ruling it a medical device would be a very bad news for us. Big Pharma will have a huge celebration.

    I think the Judge will do the correct thing. Fingers crossed.
    Truth is not related to what is believed

  10. #2219
    Full Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    145

    Default

    And now the crowd gathers for the 6 o'clock update......

  11. #2220
    ECF Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kristin View Post
    If my understanding is correct, if they are ruled a tobacco product, then the FDA cannot ban them outright, they can only regulate them. If it's ruled a medical device, the FDA has even more control.

    Kristin--it goes to how intense the approval process would be. Remember that SE and NJOY came up with the "It's a tobacco product" BEFORE the legislature passed the new statute giving the FDA jurisdiction over tobacco products. In the pendency of this case that statute was passed. At that point in time, it was the best argument SE and NJOY had because of the holding in BROWN that held that the FDA has no jurisdiction over tobacco products.


    So indeed there are different standards of approval for Drug and Drug devices and tobacco products.

    Sun

Closed Thread

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO