Smoking Everywhere V. FDA Daily Docket Sheet Update--APPEAL's COURT ISSUES STAY in Electronic Cigarette News; Originally Posted by Angela
To me, the lengthy delay gives a strong hope that the parties are talking in the ...
-
11-02-2009, 10:27 PM
#2561

Originally Posted by
Angela
To me, the lengthy delay gives a strong hope that the parties are talking in the background and the judge is delaying the ruling until they've finished their discussions.
Angela--if that was the case, I do not think Counsel for SE would have posted the other day. I do think they want the true legal scope defined so everyone knows their footing.
Sun
-
11-02-2009, 10:34 PM
#2562
Something must be going on for this to drag on as long as it is.
I just wonder what it is.
-
11-02-2009, 10:35 PM
#2563
no ruling as of the time of this post
-
11-02-2009, 10:37 PM
#2564
Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Thanx Sun and Legal One for keeping us updated. I can't imagine how much more frustrated I'd be right now if it weren't for you guys keeping us up to date on what's really going on.
-
11-02-2009, 11:34 PM
#2565

Originally Posted by
PhiHalcyon
There are only two choices. The notion that tobacco-derived nicotine (along with trace amounts of TSNAs and other alkaloids) is not derived from tobacco is no less untenable than the notion that nicotine is not a drug.
Nicotine wasn't considered a "drug" until some pharma company figured out they could make money on it. Then FDA declared it a drug. We have lots of other plant extracts that are helpful, that have not (yet) been declared a drug. Bromelain is the first that comes to mind. It is an extract of pineapple, functions as an excellent anti-inflammatory and pain reliever. (Don't tell big pharma, because they will want to have the food supplement version of it pulled off the market until they (big pharma) can run the tests and release it as a prescription medication.) I'm surprised that big pharma hasn't tried to get aloe vera declared a prescription drug.
-
11-02-2009, 11:39 PM
#2566

Originally Posted by
PhiHalcyon
the notion that nicotine is not a drug.
well the federal district courts have precedent that nicotine is, in fact, not a drug. It fails to meet the legal definition: a chemical used to treat, diagnose, or cure a disease or a chemical that alters any function or process of the body.
-
11-02-2009, 11:46 PM
#2567

Originally Posted by
Vocalek
Nicotine wasn't considered a "drug" until some pharma company figured out they could make money on it. Then
FDA declared it a drug. We have lots of other plant extracts that are helpful, that have not (yet) been declared a drug. Bromelain is the first that comes to mind. It is an extract of pineapple, functions as an excellent anti-inflammatory and pain reliever. (Don't tell big pharma, because they will want to have the food supplement version of it pulled off the market until they (big pharma) can run the tests and release it as a prescription medication.) I'm surprised that big pharma hasn't tried to get aloe vera declared a prescription drug.
Actually, it was in 1996 that the FDA decided to declare nicotine a drug in its attempt to regulate tobacco products. The four dissenting Justices in the Brown case agreed with the FDA position, and the majority did not refute it (in terms of whether or not nicotine was a drug). Nonetheless, as you may already know, I contend that it will be difficult for the FDA to regulate the ecig as a drug; and therefore, do not believe that this will be the outcome.
-
11-02-2009, 11:52 PM
#2568
SUN thank you so much for all your hard work and keepin us (the masses) up to date on things as I follow this very close.
You know it is a funny thing, the law, it is all in definitions! Also to you can never say never and never say always.
So no matter what the outcome is either way it will force changes in our industry regardless, I think .........
It is comforting to hear everyone one on the boards here sharing thoughts and insights. In the end we will know when we know as SUN has said so many times.
If it takes time then it is not an open and shut case, this is good thing I think, but it does not mean things are going to g the way we want it too ........ Freedom for Vapers!
I hope the judge has the wisdom to see what we are doing with E's is a much better solution over analogs for society. We are not the evil people here and give us a clear path forward that is achiveable.
California's Gov. sees it and it seems Judge Leon is a wise man too, now it is time to find out!
FUMA for Life .......
-
11-03-2009, 12:08 AM
#2569

Originally Posted by
FUMA king
I hope the judge has the wisdom to see what we are doing with E's is a much better solution over analogs for society. We are not the evil people here and give us a clear path forward that is achiveable.
Well said. And that clear path is called Modified Risk Tobacco Product. It's not really so complicated, and there is even a conditional provision for such a product to be marketed before it receives final approval.
Last edited by PhiHalcyon; 11-03-2009 at 12:14 AM.
-
11-03-2009, 12:10 AM
#2570
It would be nice if the judge was just like;
"Its a different cigarette, and the FDA should treat them as a tobacco cigarette until testing determines they are as dangerous or more dangerous than cigarettes."
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
Bookmarks