Smoking Everywhere V. FDA Daily Docket Sheet Update--APPEAL's COURT ISSUES STAY

[LoneRanger]

Hope ruling is before t.g. in our favor of course :-)

[nitewriter]

Sun,

I wonder which will happen first:

A ruling in this case.

or

You will be broke from checking the docket.

You could never be repaid for the amount of time you've invested in checking the docket and reporting it here, but you should really think about setting up a little "donation box" at PayPal. I know I, and many others here, would be thrilled to contribute.

Thank you again for all you do!

[PhiHalcyon]

Is it me or does is seem that one member is full of negative posts that are tying up this tread with useless chit chat give use a break!!

Just because your delusion-laden prejudice perceives the truth as being negative doesn't render my posts 'useless chit chat'. Some people, namely those with a brain, actually want to understand what the truth is, rather than keep their head in the clouds. It helps with future planning; and may even keep a few people out of jail.

[LoneRanger]

Gee, Where did this come from?

[seminolewind]

Which annoucement, theoretically, would you think would come first?

1) The announcement of the decision in this case
2) The announcement that Phillip Morris has purchased Ruyan

Whoa, wait, who put this tinfoil hat on my head?!?

That is just so funny, and true. We could take bets, or start a poll on this

[LuckyCharm]

I saw a news story on a local channel a couple of days ago, the "control freaks" want chocolate milk banned from schools.... When will the silliness stop??

I'm for banning all animal-based milk in schools. Call me ultra-silly...

~~Cheryl

[tvujec]

Just because your delusion-laden prejudice perceives the truth as being negative doesn't render my posts 'useless chit chat'. Some people, namely those with a brain, actually want to understand what the truth is, rather than keep their head in the clouds. It helps with future planning; and may even keep a few people out of jail.

This is going way too far, statements like this are just as useless and inflammatory as the opposite extremes. No one is going to jail over this, independent of the ruling. Some companies might get fined, their stock taken, and we might even lose all access (if USPS refuses to ship the product). For a user to end up in jail, we would definitely need new laws. And even then it would be extremely hard, as any sensible and enforcible rule would require banning all other products that currently contain nicotine. There is obviously tax evasion, but until tax code changes to specifically include ecig (we don't tax nicotine nor tobacco per se, taxes apply to specifically listed tobacco products) we're in the clear.

[bockafer]

Whoa, wait, who put this tinfoil hat on my head?!?

Sorry to go offtopic here but I couldn't resist: http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

[helix]

(assume Leon goes in favor of the FDA, making e-cigs a 'drug delivery device')

Is it possible that, even while these 'devices' are being tested for FDA approval, we can still push shipments of liquids and such? Assuming the post doesn't start x-raying boxes and open any box that are full of liquid containers.

Maybe even still get e-cigs?

[Mister]

This is going way too far, statements like this are just as useless and inflammatory as the opposite extremes. No one is going to jail over this, independent of the ruling.

Let's stop feeding that troll. (Not you tvujec! PhiHalcyon has passed debate and is well into trolling.)