Smoking Everywhere V. FDA Daily Docket Sheet Update--APPEAL's COURT ISSUES STAY

[SheerLuckHolmes]

My point is. If i send a letter to my house and address it to John Smith, but my name is not John Smith. Am i violating any law. Labeling the intended recepient as "Smoking Everywhere Electronic Cigarettes" does not mean that is my company name. It is simply how i wish to have my package labeled.

Rationalizing is more important that sex! Did you ever go a couple of days without a good rationalization?

[curiousJan]

Rationalizing is more important that sex! Did you ever go a couple of days without a good rationalization?

I that movie!!

[JerryRM]

So how about this? John Smith owns the "e-cig Supply Company". If he has his supplies sent to the e-cig Supply Company, Main Street, USA, customs is most likely to notice and seize the package. However if he has the supplies sent to John Smith, Main Street, USA, it has a better chance of slipping through customs.

It's his name and his address, I would think that would be legal.

[DC2]

I have come to the conclusion, that we at the ECF, Dr. Siegel, Bill Godshall and everyone who has any postive comments about the e-cig are talking to ourselves.

You conclusion is pretty much spot on.
Nobody gives a crap about us.

We need to keep on spreading the word and growing our numbers.
That is the only thing that can save us.

[Our House]

You conclusion is pretty much spot on.
Nobody gives a crap about us.

Let's not forget Judge Leon. He seems to give a crap about us.

[JerryRM]

Let's not forget Judge Leon. He seems to give a crap about us.

I have to agree Our House, he is a good and honest man, surrounded by a sea of special interest and corruption.

[DC2]

Let's not forget Judge Leon. He seems to give a crap about us.

Touche.

[Koman]

I that movie!!

What movie are you talking about?

[curiousJan]

What movie are you talking about?

The Big Chill


..........10

[ThePuck]

I really think one of the steps we need to do is stop calling them e-cigs. They are not cigarettes and we should stop calling them that. The term cigarette itself makes most non-smokers furious. The term PV or personal vaporizors really would help steer away some of the attention I would think.

Just like a regular vaporizor. How many of those are stopped at the border? We can put whatever we want into one of those to get vaporized into the air. A PV is no different except for the e-juice we use justs happens to have some nicotine in it.

So why stop the PVs shipment at the border. I can see regulating e-juice but why is the actual device a problem? Could it be the term e-cigarette?