This certainly looks like a bad road to go down,..The draft guidance recommends “substituting the nicotine in tobacco with nicotine from less harmful, nicotine containing products."
Using that logic we'll be headed for licensed Starbucks outlets. Probably inevitable too, I'm afraid...nicotine containing products (NCPs) which appreciably affect metabolism in normal usage could arguably fall within medicines legislation in terms of their pharmacological action.
This would only happen if coffee was negatively impacting
BP's profits like e-cigarettes. In that case, of course,
the FDA would have to step in to protect BP's profits.
So, if we lie to the government, its a Felony.
But if they lie to us ... it's Politics.
it actually helps there insomnia medication product lines so they are advocating for starbucks to be required consumption.