FDA: Adverse Events Related to E-Cigarettes Are Almost Nonexistent
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Like Tree6Likes
  • 3 Post By Bill Godshall
  • 1 Post By milo hobo
  • 1 Post By Vocalek
  • 1 Post By milo hobo

Thread: FDA: Adverse Events Related to E-Cigarettes Are Almost Nonexistent

  1. #1
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Berylanna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    south Bay Area, California
    Posts
    2,018
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default FDA: Adverse Events Related to E-Cigarettes Are Almost Nonexistent

    .....except they are spinning it just the opposite!

    http://rodutobaccotruth.blogspot.com...ed-to-e_6.html
    “When you choose an action, you choose the consequences of that action. When you desire a consequence you had damned well better take the action that would create it.”
    Lois McMaster Bujold, Memory

  2. #2
    Senior Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Holiday, Florida
    Posts
    184

    Default

    actually reading the AEs they list I have to disagree with some of the articles content. Now I am not saying that E-Cigarettes are causing cancer. However, all of th mentioned reactions could be caused by contents of the e-liquid. As some parties have sensetivity to the ingredients. That being said I still find it to be very minor compared to analogs. Also it is like saying someone had an allergic reaction because they tried PBJ flavored e-liquid and they are allergic to peanuts. Just common sense is all.

    I would much rather suffer the mild reactions of being sensetive to PG than the reactions that chantix causes, though.

  3. #3
    Executive Director
    Smokefree Pennsylvania
    Vaping Advocate
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,124

    Default

    Notice how the FDA's author conveniently failed to cite (or compare) the number of Adverse Event reports for NRT products, Chantix, other prescrition drugs, OTC drugs, household cleaning products, alcohol, food, cosmetics, toys or many other common household consumer products.

    Considering that at least 100 million e-cigarette products have been sold and consumed in the US since 2006, 57 adverse event reports is amazingly low (i.e. less than one in a million).

    Also, its important to note that most AE reports are coincidences, and not cause and effect relationships.

    For example, if someone is admitted to a hospital with a heart attack, stroke or disease, and if the patient (when filing out an admission form or when being interviewed) reports recent use of an e-cigarette, many doctors (especially those who heard FDA propaganda about e-cigs and/or those who saw FDA's webpage encouraging people to submit AE reports for e-cigs) would report this to FDA as an AE associated with e-cigarettes.
    2coils, budynbuick and orson like this.

  4. #4
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lake Charles La
    Posts
    321

    Default

    I almost want to start a compaign to get everyone to list on the FDA's AE list the common side-effect of "Decreased desire to smoke cigarettes, improved lung capacity, and improved sense of smell + taste, as well as improved blood pressure, ad etc". I think that they might get the message if they had to comb through that a couple hundred or even thousand times.
    supertrunker likes this.

  5. #5
    CASAA Activist Vaping Advocate
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Vocalek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, VA
    Posts
    7,164
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default

    NO!

    The FDA will just add your report to their count of Adverse Events.
    budynbuick likes this.


    ----
    Support CASAA -http://www.casaa.org/Donate_LKWE.html ---

  6. #6
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lake Charles La
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Which is why I haven't done it. I'm sure they would find a way to spin that. Probably just dump it into a naked stat (without naming the event) in with the few present making it sound bad.
    Vocalek likes this.

  7. #7
    Ultra Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    RichardV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Golden Isles of Georgia, USA
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    Bob stated:
    "For example, if someone is admitted to a hospital with a heart attack, stroke or disease, and if the patient (when filing out an admission form or when being interviewed) reports recent use of an e-cigarette, many doctors (especially those who heard FDA propaganda about e-cigs and/or those who saw FDA's webpage encouraging people to submit AE reports for e-cigs) would report this to FDA as an AE associated with e-cigarettes."


    I think for statistics to be accurate when a patient reports that they smoke and is reporting symtoms of "heart attack, stroke, congestion, etc." then an Adverse Event should be filed under the "Other Tobacco Products" column.

    ........................... 2 years smoke free 4/26/2014

  8. #8
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    7,663

    Default

    The closer we get to April ...
    The more we come to grips with the FDA's "mindset" regarding e-cigarettes.

    Mindset
    A mindset is a set of assumptions, methods, or notations held by one or more people or groups of people that is so established that it creates a powerful incentive within these people or groups to continue to adopt or accept prior behaviors, choices, or tools. This phenomenon is also sometimes described as mental inertia, "groupthink", or a "paradigm", and it is often difficult to counteract its effects upon analysis and decision making processes.

Bookmarks