+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
...vaccines for drug, nicotine adiction in Electronic Cigarette News; I don't want to believe this. Here's the link http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/backs+vaccines+drug+nicotine+addiction/2127814/story.html...
  1. #1
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada, near Vancouver
    Posts
    203

    Default ...vaccines for drug, nicotine adiction


  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    PV Master Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    doots's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Near Austin TX
    Posts
    5,721

    Default

    lol. yet e cigs might be dangerous to users.. who among us will be the first to get the vac shot to test their findings???

  4. #3
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    Don't you wish someone would shovel $10 million to a study of a practice that delivers non-harmful nicotine levels to those who want it -- us -- without delivering other dangerous chemicals at the same time?

  5. #4
    Moved On
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    334

    Default

    Well, it is already obvious that the FDA intends to introduce a nicotine-yield limit at some point; and then gradually lower that limit over time. I can remember asking myself over ten years ago - at a time when I was trying to quit - why this nicotine control and reduction scheme was not already being done.

    And, yes, an ecig-like nicotine delivery product put under the same long-term nicotine-reduction scheme is precisely what is needed in order achieve quick and tremendous gains in human harm-reduction right from the beginning.

  6. #5
    Super Member ECF Veteran frankie1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    476

    Default

    I have told my doc for years that if the medical community really wanted people to quit, they would come up with something that I could put in my mouth, suck on, get my nic and I would quit smoking! LOL They didn't, but the Chinese did!

  7. #6
    Super Member ECF Veteran frankie1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    476

    Default

    Well here is my comment....let's see if they post it!

    While we are waiting on this miracle vaccine, could we just use a bit of common sense as applied to harm reduction? Take a look at personal vaporizers. The addict gets their nicotine fix without the harmful additives of tobacco smoke. Then step down the nicotine and the addiction is nothing more than a habit, harmful to none. Might save a few million lives while trying to come up with a better solution.

  8. #7
    Super Member ECF Veteran frankie1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    476

    Default

    HA ha HA: Maybe not...seems there was a problem posting my comment and I should try again later!

  9. #8
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    256

    Default

    "
    The vaccine is meant to stimulate the immune system to make antibodies against nicotine, blocking its rewarding effects and helping to prevent relapse in smokers trying to quit."

    So the way I see it. the vaccine will not allow Nicotine to do what it does. you would be in withdrawal with no way out. Hmm, not something I want to experience.

    Nestran

  10. #9
    Super Member ECF Veteran Our House's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    400

    Default

    More freedom reduction...made FOR smokers BY non-smokers.

    "We just want to HELP you! You know, for your own protection." I hate when people do things "for your protection" by the way. As if it's not for THEIR benefit. Right.

    Do people ever consider that others might actually want nicotine...or coffee...or to gamble...or shop. Sometimes we enjoy things that FEEL GOOD. Sigh.

    What's next, caffeine vaccines? Fatty food vaccinations? Video game addiction vaccinations? Plastic surgery to implant fake smiles on our faces once they've sucked all the fun out of our lives???

  11. #10
    PV Master ECF Veteran kinabaloo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    london uk / beijing china
    Posts
    4,987
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiHalcyon View Post
    Well, it is already obvious that the FDA intends to introduce a nicotine-yield limit at some point; and then gradually lower that limit over time. I can remember asking myself over ten years ago - at a time when I was trying to quit - why this nicotine control and reduction scheme was not already being done.

    And, yes, an ecig-like nicotine delivery product put under the same long-term nicotine-reduction scheme is precisely what is needed in order achieve quick and tremendous gains in human harm-reduction right from the beginning.
    We've been down that road before with 'lights'. If want people to smoke less tar and toxins, make the things stronger not weaker.

    Since nicotine is not harmful, no need for any scheme for reducing its use. I completely disagree with that notion. In fact, it is outrageous!
    Last edited by kinabaloo; 10-30-2009 at 05:05 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO