+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 61 to 70 of 70
BT buying e cig maker? in Electronic Cigarette News; Apostle - Another great find! There's no doubt, when we go back in history and look at all of the ...
  1. #61
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran LaceyUnderall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA and Canada
    Posts
    2,570

    Default

    Apostle - Another great find!

    There's no doubt, when we go back in history and look at all of the vapor producing products, the ecig was bound to happen.

    Now.... why didn't it happen?

    1. Price in comparison to cigarettes at the time would have probably been outrageous.
    2. Price for manufacturing in the US would have been probably outrageous. We certainly didn't have China back then to make any of the goods we do now.
    3. Conspiracies... from the tobacco industry to the anti-smoking campaign... who knows! But I am sure there are tons galore.

    Oooo... this is getting interesting.
    e-smoker 4eva

  2. Advertisement
  3. #62
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran taz3cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Port Arthur, Texas
    Posts
    1,178

    Default

    Ruyan Group Holding, is not legally a Chinese company. It is traded on the Hong Kong Stock market, but it is Incorporated in the Cayman Islands. I find this very interesting.

    RUYAN GROUP (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
    如烟集團(控股)有限公司
    (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability)
    (Stock Code: 329)

    http://www.ruyangroup.com/upload/new..._Ann090310.pdf
    actions speak louder than words, do a iittle everyday to save our PV's

  4. #63
    Forum Supplier ECF Veteran BuzzKill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Central Coast Ca.
    Posts
    8,409

    Default

    HON,LIK (I assume he is with Ruyan ?) has 4 pending app's
    590,990 - 590,991 - 590,989 - 590,988 the last 2 are for power supply battery , the first 2 are for the cig

    FYI

    Later
    buzz

  5. #64
    Forum Supplier ECF Veteran BuzzKill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Central Coast Ca.
    Posts
    8,409

    Default

    I found an even older patent reference from 1954 !! it's a simulated cigar using a lamp LMAO , but the Gilbert patent ref's it pat. # 2,696,382 by A.Gelardin.

    This looks like the very beginning of the evolution ?? .

    Later
    Buzz

    Thought this would be interesting for history purposes ?

  6. #65
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VapingRulz View Post

    My worry is that the government will slap an enormous "sin tax" on e-cigs and juice. The more popular e-cigs become, the more likely it is that both BT and the government will want their cut - especially when they start to see tax revenues dry up as smokers turn instead to vaping.
    This is what I'm afraid of, besides the fact that I'm no longer inhaling smoke, the e-cigarette route seems to be cheaper in the long run, that could change soon.

  7. #66
    CASAA Activist ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    Vocalek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, VA
    Posts
    5,134
    Blog Entries
    7

    Lightbulb A thought

    If the Judge in SE & NJOY Vs. FDA rules that e-cigarettes are a tobacco product, we need to keep this in mind:

    Collected User Fees
    The Tobacco Control Act authorized the Agency to collect user fees from manufacturers and importers of cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and any other tobacco product subject to Chapter IX - Tobacco Products of the FD&C Act. FDA has started collecting user fees.
    These fees are huge. I can't see the retailers having the $$$ to jump in and play tobacco company. So perhaps if BT does buy out the product, it is a way to keep it alive.


    --------
    ------- Support CASAA - http://www.casaa.org/support/ ---

  8. #67
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran LaceyUnderall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA and Canada
    Posts
    2,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vocalek View Post
    If the Judge in SE & NJOY Vs. FDA rules that e-cigarettes are a tobacco product, we need to keep this in mind:


    These fees are huge. I can't see the retailers having the $$$ to jump in and play tobacco company. So perhaps if BT does buy out the product, it is a way to keep it alive.
    Isn't their fee schedule based on weight of tobacco? Imagine how much "weight" of tobacco is in a bottle of liquid!?! Or a cartridge?
    e-smoker 4eva

  9. #68
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I think its based on what share of the US Market each tobacco company has..so Altria is 50%.
    Altria to pay millions in tobacco user fees | Richmond Times-Dispatch

    Here's the FDA's project fee schedule too:

    The FDA will collect about $23 million for fiscal 2009. That will rise to $235 million in 2010 and grow to $712 million by 2019.

  10. #69
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran LaceyUnderall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    USA and Canada
    Posts
    2,570

    Default

    Tobacco Product Fees

    Ok... so they aren't very clear... and JohnandMe, I am not saying you are wrong but I have learned not to trust any media, regardless. I have even seen the most newsworthy get it wrong... so I have to go to the source.

    Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

    To me, it looks like this is a two fold user fee: First, you would be assessed your classification of products and then second your market share. If your classification of products exceeds your market share, then you pay the market share amount. Does that sound right (based on the link above) ?!?

    How confusing!
    e-smoker 4eva

  11. #70
    Executive Director
    Smokefree Pennsylvania
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,414

    Default

    When I called Tiffany Ellis at (510) 230-3947 to talk to her about her article on PM negotiating with Ruyan, after ten rings I was transferred to the voice mail of a person named "Jim" whose voice mailbox was full.

    And the two e-mail addresses listed for Tiffany Ellis ui@jquery.com and
    gualtmarketing@gmail.com appear suspect, but I'll try e-mailing her.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO