I have a perfectly functional sense of humor. I just get rubbed the wrong way when information like this is passed about as if it was fact. It's pretty typical right wing anti-science clap trap that sounds reasonable at first brush but seriously misleads people because most hear it and just nod their heads.
A lot of people read this stuff and believe that because of this one isolated fact that the people talking about the dangers of climate change are full of crap. Even though there is no serious debate amoung reputable scientists.
You seem to be a reasonable person interested in accurate information and you are exactly the sort of person this type of propaganda is aimed at. I didn't reply to attack you I did so to inform.
I've read quite a bit of what you post here and I've seen you to be a considered and honest individual and I understand you were meaning the statement in jest.
However I suspect that you did buy into the line else you wouldn't have made that particular funny. Because it would only be trully ammusing if it were rooted in truth. Since it is not it's simply perpetuating a lie which was exactly the reason this little tidbit was put out in the first place.
This is anoying as all the people who talk about saving trees and spotted owls when talking about the environment. Environmentalism has absolutely nothing to do with saving trees or owls and everything to do with saving humas.
It's like the other day when I picked up my 5 year from pre-school where they've been studying polution and he told me that polution hurt the earth.
No, polution hurts people, the earth could give a ****. It was here several billion years before we were and it will most likely be around a few billion after we're gone.
For what it's worth forest fires are carbon neutral ;-P



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks