Doctors & Health Insurance Question...

[ElectroLoki]

Hey all!

Just got a quick question about medical insurance and how vaporizers relate...

When you're asked officially "Are you a smoker? / How long have you been smoking?" for insurance and medical purposes... what do you answer??

Obviously the reason they ask is to determine your health status based on the negative effects of tobacco. Since vapers aren't exposed to all the nasties that traditional smokers are... should we answer no to these questions? I mean... yes, we technically smoke for the nicotine... buuuuut, is it right to second-guess the question? And (specifically in my case) would not classing vaping as 'smoking' hold up in a legal situation?

(PS: I'm a UK vaper, so this applies more to the NHS... but the same would apply for health insurance, life insurance for buying property, etc... )

[Automaton]

My insurance is up for renewal in a few months, and... nope. I don't plan to.

I don't smoke anything. Nothing's on fire. I'm not inhaling carbon monoxide. I don't smoke.

[ElectroLoki]

That's my reasoning too... but would the uneducated insurance people understand that?

We get confronted vaping in public all the time because people ldon't understand that its NOT smoking. If the insurance people are not in the know, would the think it invalidates a claim?

[Automaton]

Honestly, I don't see how they'd find out. With the information we have at this point (not just from e-cigs, but from the cumulative knowledge about the process they utilize and the ingredients in e-juice that's been compiled over decades), there is no reason to think you would come down with a smoking-related illness due to e-cigarettes.

I've seen a few posts here about people telling their docs about e-cigs. And some of them agree that it doesn't count as smoking.

I don't plan to take that risk, personally. I'm sticking to "I don't smoke."

But that's probably because I'm an American who's embittered about the insanity that is the American insurance system. Even for a non-smoker, normal human beings can't really afford insurance. Add smoking to that? Rich people only.

So I just don't plan to tell them.

[DaveP]

My wife and I had to have blood tests before buying a life insurance policy. A nurse came by the house, drew blood, checked our blood pressure, and filled out a medical history form. They also called out family doctor and requested our medical records which revealed the fact that I told the doctor I smoked. Make sure you note that you quit on your doctor's medical records or they will assume you still smoke.

I don't know how long you have to be tobacco free before the rates drop. If it's a company work policy, you probably only have to select tobacco free. If you are buying an individual policy, there may be a period before you qualify. Yesterday won't be good enough.

[carguy50]

If there ever is a dispute your insurance company will test you for nicotine if you are vaping with nicotine I'm afraid you could have a long uphill battle

[ElectroLoki]

Yeah. There's the possibility of a random blood test which will certainly show up the nicotine... which is what I'm worried about.

Is an insurance company going to care enough to investigate fully? Or, in other words... do they want to pay out? I... doubt it somehow. :\

[Buckstop]

Something else to think about. I felt I would be a non-smoker. I would think the nicotine would be no different than the patch or anything else. Wonder how the patch people answer that question??

[PaulB]

I'll bet, at least in the USA, there are more people with long-term Nicorette or Nicoderm habits than there are PV users. I wonder how they handle insurance--and how insurance handles them.

[Kate51]

This is a very good question, this is so far rather un-charted territory.
If the form asks is you smoke, and you 100% use a PV, technically you do not smoke. If it asks do you use tobacco products, again say no. If it asks do you use nicotine, answer yes. But they never ask if you drink coffee or eat Big Macs. Unfair.
As far as I've been able to understand, a bit of nicotine is not any more deadly than coffee or Mountain Dew. My blood pressure is 110/62, and I'm 63 years old, so I know I'm not on the verge of collapse. My blood/oxygen is 97+%. I'm still moving! I've never been to Three Mile Island or Chernobyl.
HOWEVER: Any testing would be for nicotine, not lungsful of tar and toxins, carcinogens, and CO2 in your tissues. Which is hardly fair, MHO. I think if we knew the awful truth, no nicotine test would be asked for if you claim to be a non-smoker. They have other methods to disqualify you or ask exhorbitant fees, high chloresterol would be one!
I also claimed myself as a non-smoker. I have been for a year-and-a-half, if there's ever a problem it will be a "pre-existing condition" and insurance would be denied if I ever need a lung transplant. My overall health, however, as a non-smoker, is hugely improved, I mean HUGE. A pretty good "risk" as a policy-holder. Except for my age.
See, you're screwed no matter how you answer, they've got you for one thing or another!!