Selecting the correct juice density. in The E-Cigarette; Al, maybe this type of technology is not for you. Every one does have questions but I mean really...
-
03-16-2009, 02:59 AM
#131
Al, maybe this type of technology is not for you. Every one does have questions but I mean really
-
03-16-2009, 03:00 AM
#132
Full Member
ECF Veteran

Originally Posted by
Kate
No Al, you spread misinformation about puff counts. You were told there were too many variables to be accurate but you insisted that you knew how they worked out.
Now I'm saying that you don't know what you're talking about and bringing other issues such as the
FDA to the thread is an attempt to cover your tracks.
Work your nicotine out how Jaaxx said and quit your assumptions.
I've already worked out my nicotine by multiplying by 10.
-
03-16-2009, 03:01 AM
#133

Originally Posted by
Al Bundy
Yes I realize that, but your analog puffs are going to equivalent to your e-cig puffs because YOU have the same lung action. The intake for the same person should be nearly equivalent.
Not necessarilly as I tend to draw harder with an e-cig. Still learning how hard to puff and for how long as if I did this with an analog I would be hot boxing it constantly.
-
03-16-2009, 03:02 AM
#134
I've tried every nic al the way up to 36mg, and my body told me when it was too much. As I'm sure yours will.
-
03-16-2009, 03:02 AM
#135
Full Member
ECF Veteran

Originally Posted by
fenez
Al, maybe this type of technology is not for you. Every one does have questions but I mean really
We'll see. I'm starting my EE courses this semester and over the coming year that puts me in a very good position to consider the e-cig equipment design and rigorously test it using proper statistical methods.*
Hey you never know, in a couple years you could buying products I designed.
-
03-16-2009, 03:03 AM
#136
Verify please - how do you determine that vaping is equivalent to smoking puff for puff?
Your assumptions could mislead vulnerable people, cause them to misjudge their dose and take double.
If they are facts then prove them, if not then please refrain from stating them as fact.
-
03-16-2009, 03:04 AM
#137

Originally Posted by
Al Bundy
Hey you never know, in a couple years you could buying products I designed.
That's hot.
-
03-16-2009, 03:04 AM
#138

Originally Posted by
Kate
Verify please - how do you determine that vaping is equivalent to smoking puff for puff?
Your assumptions could mislead vulnerable people and cause them to misjudge their dose and take double.
If they are facts then prove them, if not then please refrain from stating them as fact.
Precisely, there is no way to figure it out exactly so all this stuff is moot
-
03-16-2009, 03:06 AM
#139
Full Member
ECF Veteran

Originally Posted by
Kate
Verify please - how do you determine that vaping is equivalent to smoking puff for puff?
Your assumptions could mislead vulnerable people, cause them to misjudge their dose and take double.
If they are facts then prove them, if not then please refrain from stating them as fact.
In what world is a fact an assumption? Did you just completely ignore my posts?
Anyway I'm done with this thread. I'm satisfied with my rough estimates. Enjoy yourselves.
-
03-16-2009, 03:09 AM
#140

Originally Posted by
Al Bundy
In what world is a fact an assumption? Did you just completely ignore my posts?
Anyway I'm done with this thread. I'm satisfied with my rough estimates. Enjoy yourselves.
Nobody said a fact was an assumption as far as I know. You said your assumptions were facts.
You're a bit mixed up.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
Bookmarks