+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
Patches have caused death- PV's do not in Other Alternatives to Smoking; While reading another thread, it got me thinking. There have been several cases where The Patch has leaked and ended ...
  1. #1
    Super Member ECF Veteran Superstargoddess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    863

    Default Patches have caused death- PV's do not

    While reading another thread, it got me thinking. There have been several cases where The Patch has leaked and ended up making someone seriously sick or killing them. Yet they are still allowed on the market.

    At this point, I fail to see how when used properly, that a PV could be less safe than that. I know that not all patches have had that problem and that it's hopefully an isolated incident that they have fixed, but the fact still remains.

    It may be an extreme look at the whole situation, but I think that we really do need to start comparing other Nicotine delivery methods with PVs.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #2
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    450

    Default

    If you want to classify PVs into NRT (nicotine replacement therapy) then it falls under the strict guidelines of the FDA.

  4. #3
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15

    Default

    PVs and smoking cessasion devices like patches and gum aren't very comparable because the former is a substitute to cigarettes, and the latter helps get rid of their nicotine dependence altogether.

    The patch is used to wean somebody off of nicotine so they don't face withdrawal symptoms and it isn't something they will be using for a long time if it is successful. The point of PVs is a healthier replacement to cigarettes, but PVs are not nearly as effective in ridding of nicotine dependence as a pre-planned schedule of patches in tapered doses.

    Can you provide a source for this nicotine patch death? I wouldn't be surprised if it was just some idiot who coated his body in them.

  5. #4
    Supplier
    ECF Veteran
    ECF Veteran Shining Wit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North of England
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superstargoddess View Post
    While reading another thread, it got me thinking. There have been several cases where The Patch has leaked and ended up making someone seriously sick or killing them. Yet they are still allowed on the market.

    At this point, I fail to see how when used properly, that a PV could be less safe than that. I know that not all patches have had that problem and that it's hopefully an isolated incident that they have fixed, but the fact still remains.

    It may be an extreme look at the whole situation, but I think that we really do need to start comparing other Nicotine delivery methods with PVs.
    I feel obliged to play devil's advocate here.
    I think a move toward less sensationalist headlines and responsible/accurate writing would do more to help our cause.
    You state "Patches have caused death- PV's do not", but there are 2 gaping holes in that one statement:

    1. You have offered absolutely no evidence to support your claim that patches have caused serious illness or death. Please cite your sources.

    2. You have claimed that PVs do not cause death, again without any supporting evidence or statistics, other than the assumption we are obliged to make that you personally do not know of any. PVs and the substances involved in vaping do have the potential to cause death, but only if misused or abused, which could probably be said of a number of NRT substances as they all contain a potentially lethal poison.

    We need to focus on promoting PVs as a safer alternative and the only way we can do that is by telling the truth, which means testing and publishing results that show them to be within reasonably acceptable boundaries. It is the authorities that will determine those boundaries, so it is to our benefit to work as closely as possible with them in order to have some input when regulations are being formed. There is far more chance of canvassing support if you are sat at a table with someone than there is by throwing bricks through their windows. That is not a sellout, it is a reality.
    John.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    200

    Default Patches and 0mg carts or liquid

    What do you think of this idea? My husband thinks that the best way to make good use of a PV is to do the whole step program with the patches while "smoking" the e-cig with 0mg nic juice. That way you don't have to worry about how much nic you are taking in, or poisoning yourself with the e-liquid.

    I got a 510 a couple days ago, haven't used it much yet, but I am liking the possibilities.

    My husband really wants me to do it his way. But, I am worried that it wont be the same as just smoking the nic liquid.And if I go on the patches I wouldn't be able to have an occasional anolog until I am comfortable with my new habit.

    Ideas please and thanks

  7. #6
    PV Master ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Port Charlotte, FL USA
    Posts
    5,624

    Default

    Any method that prevents you some sucking destructive tobacco smoke into your lungs is good. But patches have their own problems -- ineffective and skin irritating, to name just two. Plus the expense.

    Even though the World Health Organization won't endorse it, e-cigs can be used like any other step-down program. Start at about 11mg liquid and step down to 8mg, then 0mg. Take as long as you need between strength changes. If you feel the need for more nicotine, increase your dose for awhile, then try again.

    Nothing wrong, per se, with patch and 0-nic e-smoking. But not much is gained that way.

  8. #7
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    T-Town Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,283

    Default

    Not as many people use PVs as much as patches.

    Give it time.....

  9. #8
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Western NJ
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
    Any method that prevents you some sucking destructive tobacco smoke into your lungs is good. But patches have their own problems -- ineffective and skin irritating, to name just two. Plus the expense.
    Plus they aren't necessarily effective....

    OTC Nicotine Patch - Does it really double your chances of quitting? by John R. Polito

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    11

    Default

    It was not until after my nicotine overdose, courtesy of the patch, that I ever heard anything harmful about them. While in the hospital a physician told me that a small of the population does not sweat enough and this alone can cause the time released nicotine to rapidly dump into one's system, which almost always results in overdose

  11. #10
    Senior Member ECF Veteran tims's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    152

    Default

    Sweating makes the nic come out faster, so if your sweating it's dumping more nic into your system, frezzing then heating will also dump much more nic.

    The way they work is it releases so much at normal body temps, if your temps go up it lets more nic out, so when your wearing a patch. You would want to keep your self from over heating, and if you over heat for very long, take the patch off till you cool off.
    Last edited by tims; 01-16-2010 at 10:29 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO