+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
Ever read this? in Health and Medical Issues; We in the US have bought heavily into the biological side of addictive behavior. I hate to break it to ...
  1. #11
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO, USA
    Posts
    112

    Default As an addictions counselor...

    We in the US have bought heavily into the biological side of addictive behavior. I hate to break it to you, but there are NO irrefutable studies that indicate a genetic disposition to addiction. As such, looking at the drug itself is insufficient to indicate its level of addictive potential. Don't forget, some kids get strung out on sniffing Sharpies! The chemical only functions in combination with the behavior. Additionally, associations and expectations play a large role in how addicted we become. Most of us associate smoking with positive social interactions, drinking, a relaxing stroll, a nice break during a hard day's work, etc. And we expect our smoke breaks to be relaxing. I cannot stand the useless direction so much research seems to take in regards to these issues.

    On a psychopharmacologic note, nicotine imitates acetylcholine in the brain, and its possible that this peptide functions differently in humans than in animal test subjects.

    Cheers,
    -Mickey

  2. Advertisement
  3. #12
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDMickey View Post
    I hate to break it to you, but there are NO irrefutable studies that indicate a genetic disposition to addiction.
    People who study adopted and separated twins would beg to disagree. In fact adopted vs. not altogether.

  4. #13
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO, USA
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie View Post
    People who study adopted and separated twins would beg to disagree. In fact adopted vs. not altogether.
    As this is tangential to the point of the discussion, I am going to mostly leave this alone. And I don't feel like going through my books and getting reference after reference. But please believe, I have spent many hours researching this topic and read both point and counterpoint.

    I am not saying genetics do not play a role in addiction, but genetic determinism is just plain silly. Even height depends approximately 20% on environmental factors (early childhood diet, etc). If genetics cannot explain something as simple as height, how could it hope to encompass something as complicated as addiction?

    Addiction is multiaxial. Genetic determinism attempts to override the emotional underpinnings of addictive issues.

  5. #14
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,161

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDMickey View Post
    I am not saying genetics do not play a role in addiction
    Okay, then I misunderstood your statement "there are NO irrefutable studies that indicate a genetic disposition to addiction."

  6. #15
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Denver, CO, USA
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamie View Post
    Okay, then I misunderstood your statement "there are NO irrefutable studies that indicate a genetic disposition to addiction."
    Ok, sorry, that was poorly worded.

  7. #16
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,161

    Default


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO