e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Nicotine
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Nicotine The molecule that binds us all! All posts relating to addiction and the effects of nicotine on the body and mind go here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2009, 07:48 PM   #41
Super Member
 
Bones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Default

It reminds me a lot of the early days of the INTERNET - I recall a time when it was all bulletin boards and text -
A time when I had ACTUALLY seen EVERY site that there was to see -
Then graphical browsers came about and the INTERNET became available to the masses - Many of my friends from the infancy of cyber-space treated the newcomers like outsiders or buffoons who had no business being there and were going to "ruin it" for the "RIGHTFUL" citizens of cyberspace - As a pioneer in e-commerce - I was shocked by this - I have been equally shocked by this same mentality rearing it's head on this board - Just because you came to something first - Does not give you dominion over it nor does it mean that the opinions and observations of newcomers are to be ignored or ridiculed - Often it is the fresh set of eyes that present the most astounding and innovative developments - The pioneers often can't see the forest for the trees - - I had a site on-line and selling product daily at a time when Bill Gates was doing TV interviews stating "It will be 15-20 years before people shop on-line" - To all the e-cig pioneers -We thank you for your baby-steps - But as this thing goes GLOBAL - You should welcome newcomers and their questions with open arms - As with cyberspace - They will be the ones to shape the future -


There are no stupid questions - but - sadly- there are often stupid answers - tests are great - still- it is more important that you listen to your body - each person is unique in how the body reacts to any given substance - a test is a helpful guide - even when one is 99% sure of conception having occurred - one still tests for it rather than waiting for birth as a conformation -
__________________
We are the music makers - We are the dreamers of the dream!
Bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 09:05 PM   #42
Supporting Member
 
Kate51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
Default To Joanna

I just ordered a TobacAlert kit, it cost me about $20, but I don't care. If it tells me what I want to see, it will be worth it, one way or the other. These are also available on eBay for $20+change.
It does measure the cotinine ng/ml in urine, so will be very anxious to get it. I think it is just one strip, not sure about that (it is). With some shopping around there may be others cheaper and more test strips, but don't have the time right now to look. (found none)
Will let everyone know the results. (Unless it's BAD) no, will be honest about it. If it also tells me I'm pregnant, the WHOLE WORLD will know!

EDIT: An added note, these tests are probably as reliable as any regarding the amount of nicotine being circulated from vaping. They use a standard measure (cotinine level) which is by-product of nicotine passed through the system into urine. I for one am interested in the level in my body, and get an idea (although I am not going to spend a day smoking 3 packs of cigarettes!) of whether or not vaporized nicotine juice (I know the strength I'm using) is more substantial in my system or less, this test will tell me if I am right. I feel my nicotine level is much lower than when I smoked analogs. (jittery, hunger, etc.) If this is true, I feel much more comfortable in advising friends and relatives to think about switching to e-cigs. Many thanks to Tom09 for the help, thanks to Joanna for the inspiration.

This is the thread for the Eisenberg test for Ruyan:
Nicotine absorbtion from vaping research
__________________


Smokers have more choices than just quitting or dying

Last edited by Kate51; 06-30-2009 at 01:29 AM.
Kate51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 03:48 AM   #43
Senior Member
 
Tom09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 200
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoAnna1010 View Post

Of course, this would be very general information, specific to me and my habits -one smoker but it would be good general information and interesting.
Hi Joanna,
I’m all with you. This simple test could yield good general information and is certainly worth a try. I had the links on my desktop, because I was thinking along similar lines. The retail consumer price just stalled me a bit. Well, it’s not really expensive, but I decided to support the ecig hardware industry instead . You may not necessarily have to pay the retail price, if you (or someone on your behalf) could wave an academic affiliation and credentials. Test producers may be happy to find their product in a scientific environment and eager to send samples for evaluation. And who could know at an initial stage, if some low-budged, pilot study won’t turn into something substantial . Anyway, will be highly interested to read about what transpires.
All the best,
Tom
Tom09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 11:56 PM   #44
Super Member
 
Bones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate51 View Post
I just ordered a TobacAlert kit, it cost me about $20, but I don't care. If it tells me what I want to see, it will be worth it, one way or the other. These are also available on eBay for $20+change.
It does measure the cotinine ng/ml in urine, so will be very anxious to get it. I think it is just one strip, not sure about that (it is). With some shopping around there may be others cheaper and more test strips, but don't have the time right now to look. (found none)
Will let everyone know the results. (Unless it's BAD) no, will be honest about it. If it also tells me I'm pregnant, the WHOLE WORLD will know!

EDIT: An added note, these tests are probably as reliable as any regarding the amount of nicotine being circulated from vaping. They use a standard measure (cotinine level) which is by-product of nicotine passed through the system into urine. I for one am interested in the level in my body, and get an idea (although I am not going to spend a day smoking 3 packs of cigarettes!) of whether or not vaporized nicotine juice (I know the strength I'm using) is more substantial in my system or less, this test will tell me if I am right. I feel my nicotine level is much lower than when I smoked analogs. (jittery, hunger, etc.) If this is true, I feel much more comfortable in advising friends and relatives to think about switching to e-cigs. Many thanks to Tom09 for the help, thanks to Joanna for the inspiration.

Not that I want you to smoke 3 packs of analogs - But - How will you know how it compares if you do not?

"whether or not vaporized nicotine juice (I know the strength I'm using) is more substantial in my system or less,"

More or less than what? - Different MG's of Juice?
__________________
We are the music makers - We are the dreamers of the dream!
Bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 01:21 AM   #45
Supporting Member
 
Kate51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
Default Bones

I guess you have a point there...geez, I don't know if I could stand that.
But with that test, if it tests low I will be thrilled, if it doesn't then I would have to do a comparison. The info for cigarettes is known, though, so I would have to do the math to estimate what the number would be.
With atomizing nicotine, there are no knowns, so far, except for the Ruyan testing done in New Zealand. Three packs of cigarettes would be approx 1500-2000 ng/ml. I'm hoping this test will run 300-400 ng/ml(heavy vaping). And you're right, my liquid is 24mg/ml. My test would be a lot different than someone who's only doing 11mg/ml.
So if my test is high, I would want to either lower nicotine concentration, which wouldn't be a problem, or not vape as much, which would be a problem, that might make me a little grumpy! I have a feeling however that the cotinine level will be lower than expected, based on the NZ tests.
That would be great. I just want to know.
__________________


Smokers have more choices than just quitting or dying
Kate51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 05:50 AM   #46
Super Member
 
KreeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: West Texas
Posts: 784
Default

Scientific, this is not. This could give some indications of something to the OP, but that is inconclusive at best. The simple differences from day to day in one person's body would be enough to rule out any consistant analysis, and would certainly rule out any coherent analysis for vapers in general (since we all have different bodies).
__________________
KreeL - Team 36mg

Last edited by KreeL; 06-30-2009 at 06:53 AM.
KreeL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 06:04 AM   #47
Supporting Member
 
Kate51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KreeL View Post
Scientific, this is not. This could give some indications of something to the OP, but that is inconclusive at best. The simple differences from day to day in one person's body would be enough to rule out any consistant analysis, and would certainly rule out any coherent analysis for vapers in general (since we all have different bodies). fgvbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbb\\\\\\\\]]]]]]]]]
]
Nice! I think that has been noted, this would be a personal test.
Certainly would not want to speak on your behalf. Coherent now?
__________________


Smokers have more choices than just quitting or dying
Kate51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 06:16 AM   #48
Super Member
 
Bones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate51 View Post
I guess you have a point there...geez, I don't know if I could stand that.
But with that test, if it tests low I will be thrilled, if it doesn't then I would have to do a comparison. The info for cigarettes is known, though, so I would have to do the math to estimate what the number would be.
With atomizing nicotine, there are no knowns, so far, except for the Ruyan testing done in New Zealand. Three packs of cigarettes would be approx 1500-2000 ng/ml. I'm hoping this test will run 300-400 ng/ml(heavy vaping). And you're right, my liquid is 24mg/ml. My test would be a lot different than someone who's only doing 11mg/ml.
So if my test is high, I would want to either lower nicotine concentration, which wouldn't be a problem, or not vape as much, which would be a problem, that might make me a little grumpy! I have a feeling however that the cotinine level will be lower than expected, based on the NZ tests.
That would be great. I just want to know.
Cool - Thanks - Was just curious -
__________________
We are the music makers - We are the dreamers of the dream!

Last edited by Bones; 06-30-2009 at 06:33 AM.
Bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 06:29 AM   #49
Supporting Member
 
Kate51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Argyle Wi USA
Posts: 1,935
Default

Quote:
Cool - Thanks - Was just curious - Also curious about where those nicotine in analog figures come from - The highest figue that I have ever seen is 2.4mg in One Analog - 20 in a pack x 3 = 60
60*2.4=144mg. - you got 1500-2000mg - From where?
__________________
Bones, it is 1500-2000 ng/ml of cotinine as per test standard.
__________________


Smokers have more choices than just quitting or dying
Kate51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 06:35 AM   #50
Super Member
 
Bones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KreeL View Post
Scientific, this is not. This could give some indications of something to the OP, but that is inconclusive at best. The simple differences from day to day in one person's body would be enough to rule out any consistant analysis, and would certainly rule out any coherent analysis for vapers in general (since we all have different bodies). fgvbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbb\\\\\\\\]]]]]]]]]
]

Are you serious - ? "rule out any consistant analysis" - -
She just wants to take a test man - Leave her alone -

man some ppl -
__________________
We are the music makers - We are the dreamers of the dream!
Bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184