e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Nicotine
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Nicotine The molecule that binds us all! All posts relating to addiction and the effects of nicotine on the body and mind go here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2009, 02:43 PM   #41
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

I would if I could, if it could duplicate the hit of a cigarette. Somehow, I don't think that would work.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 03:40 PM   #42
Full Member
 
cmacpduff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Carolina USA- the tobacco State
Posts: 31
Default

RustyLug: my friend, one of the reasons I prefer the 36 mg is that the nicotine strength weakens from light and heat. A bottle that says 36 may be much weaker after storage and shipping even from domestic sources. By the time it sits around my home, it's weaker still. I've never noticed the same 'hit' from 36 mg that I experience from even a light analogue cigarette. Does anybody else out there have the same experience?
cmacpduff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 11:17 PM   #43
Super Member
 
Vocalek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 606
Default

I have emailed Dr. Chellappan, one of the authors of the article "Nicotine induces cell proliferation, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in a variety of human cancer cell lines" asking for an opinion as to how the research applies to non-smoking nicotine users. The article (which can be downloaded at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/j...TRY=1&SRETRY=0 stated that there is a dose-response relationship. Since blood levels of nicotine are typically lower in those get their nicotine from gum, lozenges, and inhalers, could they quantify the increased risk, if any. If I get a response, I will will post it here.
__________________
Vocalek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
cardiovascular, health, heart, medical, nicotine

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184