e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Nicotine
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Nicotine The molecule that binds us all! All posts relating to addiction and the effects of nicotine on the body and mind go here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2008, 12:58 AM   #1
4mer 4um Addict
 
dc2k08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: .ie
Posts: 1,815
Default First of 8,000 lawsuits against Big Smoke for addicting consumers to a deadly product

Tobacco trial: Philip Morris disputes addiction claims - Breaking News - MiamiHerald.com
__________________
dc2k08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:12 AM   #2
ECF Veteran
 
robw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 608
Blog Entries: 2
Default

This is something any nicotine product could face.
What happens if some one uses to many nicorette gum and dies from nicotine overdose.

For that matter what happens if Starbucks lets someone drink to much caffeine and they have a heart attack.

What happens if someone drinks 3 bottle of whiskey and dies from alcohol poisoning.

You accept the risk when you are an adult and consent to using a product that has dangerous chemicals
__________________
robw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:17 AM   #3
ECF Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 467
Default

We will have nobody to sue if e-liquid turns out to be deadly. Not a big deal for me, but might be for US citizens.. hehehe
Bertrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:19 AM   #4
Moved On
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 7,355
Default

You accept the risk when the risks are made clear but some companies pretend their products are not dangerous. That's what tobacco companies used to say.

Esmoking sellers will have to answer to claims for selling a toxic, addictive chemical to us without clear warnings and proper packaging if they are not more careful.
Kate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:22 AM   #5
4mer 4um Addict
 
dc2k08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: .ie
Posts: 1,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate View Post
Esmoking sellers will have to answer to claims for selling a toxic, addictive chemical to us without clear warnings and proper packaging if they are not more careful.
That's for sure, especially in sue-happy state-side.
__________________
dc2k08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:32 AM   #6
Moved On
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 7,355
Default

Just imagine a few years from now after we have been sold esmoking as a safer alternative to smoking. It delivers higher doses of nicotine, proving more addictive and harder to stop than smoking. Some people develop lung disease due to inhaling flavourings and others are found to have cancer linked to propylene oxide contamination. Circulatory problems become more common due to the vaso constrictive properties of nicotine.

The crime is not selling us the esmoking gear, it's selling us a 'healthier' concept. People who buy that idea will be very angry if things go belly up.
Kate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:37 AM   #7
4mer 4um Addict
 
dc2k08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: .ie
Posts: 1,815
Default

you spelled it all out there clearly Kate. couldn't say it any better. it would be wise of suppliers to take notice.
__________________
dc2k08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:43 AM   #8
ECF Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate View Post
The crime is not selling us the esmoking gear, it's selling us a 'healthier' concept. People who buy that idea will be very angry if things go belly up.
I bought into that. I'm not too sure any more, and if it does turn out to be dangerous, I will be more annoyed at the lack of research and regulation. Usually for these sorts of things each batch should get tested by the manufacturer, the wholesaler, the pharmaceutical company that uses it. Here, it's not clear that it's comprehensively tested by anyone.

But to say that e-cigarette sellers will have to face up, etc. is nonsense. Their assets wouldn't even cover one negligence case let alone a class action: they are nothing like tobacco companies. Nobody smokes one e-liquid brand exclusively, so if it's poisonous because of contamination, it will be impossible to prove the source of the contamination years down the track. And at least for quite a few years the cancers or whatever we get will be put down to a history of smoking.
Bertrand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:47 AM   #9
4mer 4um Addict
 
dc2k08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: .ie
Posts: 1,815
Default

true story, they would also get into a dispute as to how to quantify "healthier" or "safer".
__________________
dc2k08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 01:57 AM   #10
Moved On
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 7,355
Default

They don't have the resources of tobacco companies to defend themselves if there are lawsuits. Financially they stand to lose the shirts off their backs and their livelihoods. Socially they will have more problems, justifying making a profit from selling toxins will be one of them.

North Americans tend to focus on financial punishments but I believe there are worse things, stigma being one.
Kate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Tags
addiction, ethics, law, nicotine, trading

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184