MickiO,
One would be well advised to read DVap thread on determining nic.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/for...-new-post.html
Analogs are about 10% efficient and DVaps testing proves that e cigs and liquid are almost 50% efficient in nic delivery.
Thats a hard fact to challenge.
Sure, there will always be 2 sides to anything. DVaps tests proved the nicotine content in the recovered vapor vs the starting amount.
Maybe someone should show trog the thread......................
martha,
DVaps tests also show the the suppliers tested were pretty much "dead on" with a couple exceptions. It pretty well covers "are we getting what we pay for".
At least to me it does..................
At this point, I'd discount anything the FDA says due to thier already proven biasing and skewed reporting to the public what was actually found and the way they decided to test it against an inhaler , not an analog, and then tell just part of the story that favored thier position.
How many people are using an ecig to replace an inhaler?
If they had tested it against an analog they would have had no case.



12Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
I also find that nicotine alone is too stimulating, wheras smoking is more mellow (even though faster in effect). This doesn't quite capture it, I'll leave it at 'more rounded'.
. I'm staying tuned in. Hail Marys await.


Bookmarks