on my facebook casaa feed aparently the new england journal of medicine has retracted the study. Can anyone confirm this? I am on my feature phone and my abilities .are liimited. Thanks mike
formaldehyde study retracted?
- Thread starter skoony
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Being formally called out on their acceptance of the BS is certainly a step in the right direction.
And in the end........
The authors reply: Nitzkin et al. state that high levels of formaldehyde are found only under electronic nicotine-delivery system (ENDS) conditions that will not generally be selected by the users of these devices, making our results of limited importance.
Yeah........ pointing out the bleeding obvious.
The authors reply: Nitzkin et al. state that high levels of formaldehyde are found only under electronic nicotine-delivery system (ENDS) conditions that will not generally be selected by the users of these devices, making our results of limited importance.
Yeah........ pointing out the bleeding obvious.
Still, that report has made it into the propaganda and isn't going away. Burnt is burnt, who would've guessed ... it would be more interesting to see what a slightly burnt hit results in. It wouldn't be a bad idea if starter kits came with a warning (not legally forced) such as "a burning flavor is NOT normal for an e-cigarette. Should this happen, discontinue use until the problem can be corrected" .
Won't stop the ANTZ or anyone else with an axe to grind from quoting it.
Allegations/accusations always make the front page, retractions end up somewhere in oh-by-the-way news...
Allegations/accusations always make the front page, retractions end up somewhere in oh-by-the-way news...
The media was all over this when it came out - what a surprise that the follow up with the truth doesn't get a mention.
Maybe ECF Members should be Sending this Info to their Local and National Media Affiliates?
Saw a funny meme the other day -- "So it's time to change the wick... when it tastes like a cigarette?"
Andria
From the start this was compared to the dangerous components that could form by burning meat to an inedible state. Yes a steak can turn into carcinogens but no one in their right mind would eat it.
Glad to see they have back peddled some on this but as has been mentioned the damage is done the moment the media trumpets out the line that suits their agenda. The information available to the general public on vaping is so conflicting it is no wonder there is confusion, confusion is the seed for doubt and that is the only leg TC has left to stand on once the science is looked at. Unfortunately FUD is a very powerful tool that is easier for many to absorb than facts.
Glad to see they have back peddled some on this but as has been mentioned the damage is done the moment the media trumpets out the line that suits their agenda. The information available to the general public on vaping is so conflicting it is no wonder there is confusion, confusion is the seed for doubt and that is the only leg TC has left to stand on once the science is looked at. Unfortunately FUD is a very powerful tool that is easier for many to absorb than facts.
- Apr 2, 2009
- 5,171
- 13,288
- 66
Earlier this week, 40 scientific and public health experts from many different countries sent a complaint to the NEJM urging the journal to retract the junk formaldehyde study. I was among the cosigners.
I've been thinking this. Thanks for thinking it enough to post it.
thanks Bill,
that's what i probably seen on facebook. some ones comment i
misconstrued.
regards
mike
I burned my toast a little bit yesterday morning by keeping it on top of my wood stove for too long. (Senior moment).
Should wood stoves be banned?
Oh, wait. The EPA is already on that for unrelated reasons.
Should wood stoves be banned?
Oh, wait. The EPA is already on that for unrelated reasons.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
