e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > The E-Cigarette > Product feature and design requests

Product feature and design requests Please post any features you would like to see incorporated into e-cigarette technology in the future. Hopefully we can get the manufacturers to take notice.

Reply
 
LinkBack (5) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2008, 05:06 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
icemanmaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: U.K. Halifax West Yorkshire
Posts: 296
Default

I have a gamucci and this is a different It is more of a ball of metal than a strip. It has been going strong for a while now. I also have a few cheap back ups I got for £4.99 and they seem ok as well so maybe I am just lucky.
icemanmaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 07:31 AM   #32
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10
Default First Post...Whoooo!

Hola, so I have been kind of a forum lurker here for a while, but after an idea I had, I decided that I need the opinion of experienced e-smokers.

It looks to me like the major inefficiency of a normal atomizer is the steel wool-to-fiber e-liquid transfer. As long as there is liquid in the wick, there is no reason it should burn, but the cotton-like stuff in the cartridge doesn't always allow the proper (or adequate) amount of e-liquid to flow into the fiber, thus letting the fiber burn.

My idea is to eliminate the steel wool altogether. Imagine an oil candle...the perfect amount of oil needed to maintain the flame is drawn, through capillary action, to the tip of the wick, and burnt off. It's self-regulating, rarely burns the wick (except occasionally at the tip) and pretty damn stable. Now imagine that, where the flame would normally burn at, is replaced by a ni-chrome heating coil, and the lower reservoir is filled with e-liquid. As long as the thickness of the wick was able to match the exact amount at the exact speed of the coil's vaporizing ability, then there (in theory) would be no burning of the wick...a simple mass/flow equation? Also, because very little fluid is actually required for the e-smoke, a small reservoir the size of a mini's cartridge could last for quite a while!

I have actually drawn out some good diagrams, with some other smaller features not mentioned here, and if I get some time, I'll upload them.

Oh, and I'm going to school to be an electrical and computer engineer one day, so this may be right up my alley...
kmk1018 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 10:08 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 228
Default

Loads of problems here. How are going to keep that wick wet when cart is half full? How are you going to connect that wick to cartridge so it can be replaced? Also you need to get air to flow straight through the coil. I've got couple plans ready but unfortunatelly building a proto is pain in the ass. I'm sure you can make a quick buck by selling the details to some chinese factory if you can actually show it actually works... I think Ruyan tried that way and ended up with a uber complex design that cost too much build. But hey, you can always try
E-cigs have plenty of stupid design flaws but talking about them here isn't going to help anyone. Think about how these devices let you know when battery runs out. Who wants to count how many times led blinks? Stupid idea.

Last edited by jigtg; 10-16-2008 at 10:12 AM.
jigtg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:23 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
SmokingInTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jigtg View Post
...but talking about them here isn't going to help anyone...
I want to disagree with this statement. I think our open discussions and ideas are exactly what is needed. Although many of us lack the technical expertise to execute a design change, many of us have ideas on how to improve the designs. I would be MORE than happy to share all of my ideas, because that may spark somebody's imagination, and the next thing you know, someone else builds one, which improves things for us all.

Admittedly, the "Bathtub Toaster" probably wasn't the greatest idea, but it does show creativity, and I'm positive the best inventions are seldom the creation of only a single individual in a vacuum.

Now, I'm going back to my plans for the 55 gallon e-cig cartridge.
__________________
Tex

[ I used to be very indecisive, but now...I'm not so sure.]
SmokingInTexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 01:42 PM   #35
9 Months Smoke Free!!
 
leaford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 1,961
Default

Go for it, KMK. Souns like building one would be right up your alley.
__________________
Sadly, we live in a society where education is equated with elitism, and ignorance is equated with authenticity.
leaford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 02:15 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 228
Default

OK, you are right it helps someone, Janty. No other manufacturer reads this forum. I dont feel like helping Janty because they are already getting too good at what they do. If they get too good, they will become a monopoly and prices go high. Healty competition is what keeps prices reasonable. Sailebao(or the company that makes RN series) is the type of company I might help... they aren't too good but good enough to successfully execute a good plan.
jigtg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 04:14 PM   #37
Super Member
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 2,895
Default

Not to get into a furious argument with you, Jigtg, but I strongly believe in "may the best man win." I will not support second-rate items or inventions. I will buy only the best idea, executed as well as possible. If Janty is the best -- and from my experiences it is -- then it has my wholehearted support.

Markets take care of themselves, based on many factors, not just price. May the best man win.
TropicalBob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 07:04 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: EU
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
Not to get into a furious argument with you, Jigtg, but I strongly believe in "may the best man win." I will not support second-rate items or inventions. I will buy only the best idea, executed as well as possible. If Janty is the best -- and from my experiences it is -- then it has my wholehearted support.

Markets take care of themselves, based on many factors, not just price. May the best man win.
Healthy markets take care of themselves. Ruyan is probably going to win USA markets although I dont really like their rip-off strategy. Still would be nice to have Sedansa in the game. Anyway, it takes at least 3 big players to make a heathy market. In time market shares get balanced across the world.

It would be great if half of the crappy e-cigs manufacturers would disappear overnight. Life would be so much easier.
jigtg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2008, 07:05 PM   #39
Full Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Iowa City, IA, USA
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Loads of problems here. How are going to keep that wick wet when cart is half full? How are you going to connect that wick to cartridge so it can be replaced? Also you need to get air to flow straight through the coil. I've got couple plans ready but unfortunatelly building a proto is pain in the ass.
A. Capillary action will draw the e-liquid through the wick (the e-liquid isn't in the cotton-like stuff, its liquid in a vial).
B. I got that figured out. The wick is attached to the to actual atomizer, the "cartridge" is a vial which can be refilled.
C. No, you don't. As long as there is a pressure difference, vapor will drawn out. And if you're sucking, there will be air in motion, which exerts lower pressure (Bernoulli's Principle), and the vapor, having standard vapor pressure, will be greater.
D. You really shouldn't build a prototype, let the company do that. Instead focus on a proof-of-concept.


And thanks leaford, if I ever get this working, I'll send you one of my first.
kmk1018 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 04:26 AM   #40
Super Member
 
Kimmiegrif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland/Florida USA
Posts: 592
Default I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
Not to get into a furious argument with you, Jigtg, but I strongly believe in "may the best man win." I will not support second-rate items or inventions. I will buy only the best idea, executed as well as possible. If Janty is the best -- and from my experiences it is -- then it has my wholehearted support.

Markets take care of themselves, based on many factors, not just price. May the best man win.

unless the govt gets involved...then it doesn't matter...the best man doesn't win...the weak are rescued
Kimmiegrif is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
atomizer, rn4081, super cigarette

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/product-feature-design-requests/1053-there-better-atomizer-design.html
Posted By For Type Date
Elgery & Sedansa e-sigareti foorum! www.elgery.com • Vaata teemat - vastupidavus This thread Refback 08-07-2008 09:41 AM
Elgery & Sedansa e-sigareti foorum! www.elgery.com • Vaata teemat - vastupidavus This thread Refback 08-06-2008 02:49 PM
ELEKTRONICZNE PAPIEROSY - FORUM :: Zobacz temat - Mini e-papieros (model RN4081) This thread Refback 08-05-2008 10:09 PM
Fast Statistics : Last referers This thread Refback 07-15-2008 07:09 PM
Gamucci Micro Electronic Cigarette - Don’t bother! | Philip Nicosia This thread Refback 07-06-2008 03:58 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 PM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2008


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29