New batt option for 18650 - Page 2
Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 131
Like Tree60Likes

Thread: New batt option for 18650

  1. #11
    PV Master Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    bushmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Colville, WA
    Posts
    5,005

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Decidion View Post
    Doh...they came in to the post office today, but it's closed so I can;t get them until Monday ;\
    Aaaah, life in Republic.

  2. #12
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    48

    Default

    thanks for posting. my AW's are about a year old and i think ill try the Panasonic batts out.

  3. #13
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    muriarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Monterrey, MX / McAllen, TX
    Posts
    326

    Default

    I just purchased 2, had a bit of trouble with the website... but they are on the way right now!

  4. #14
    Senior Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Bowtie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    South of Heaven
    Posts
    179
    Needo likes this.

  5. #15
    Senior Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Decidion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Ok, got them in and they are on the charger, since they arrived at 3.60v

    I did notice that Orbtronic raised the price by $1.08 to 10.99 now though...

  6. #16
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    muriarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Monterrey, MX / McAllen, TX
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Good thing I bought mine before the price change!

  7. #17
    Senior Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Decidion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Ok, they charged up to 4.10 - 4.12 volts and I am vaping away right now. My understanding is that new batteries take a good 15 or so charges to get up to full speed, so I assume they will go up to 4.18-4.20 like my AW IMRs in a week or two, time will tell.

    One thing I have noticed is that the overall length is identical to the AW IRMs, however the case on these panasonic batteries is 1mm longer and the positive nipple does not protrude as far as with the AW IMRs. In fact, the nipple on the Panasonic batteries is flush with the top of the case. This means the spring is in fact compressed 1mm more and that you have to depress the button 1mm more to get it to fire. This really isn't a big deal to me, as I feel there is still plenty of room for a spring collapse failure and I have a 3ml syringe cap on my button for comfort anyway.

    I'll report back in a few days to give some idea on how long they last compared to the AW IMRs, but it won't be scientific. At 1600ma, the AW IMRs last me 1-1/2 days, so I am hoping these 2250ma Panasonics last 2+ days for me. Again, I expect them to start to perform better after 15 charge cycles.
    pianoguy likes this.

  8. #18
    PV Master Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    bushmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Colville, WA
    Posts
    5,005

    Default

    Looking forward to your further review, Decidion.

  9. #19
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    645

    Default

    The Panasonics with the ...CH at the end (stay away from the ...CG) are indeed good safe chemistry batteries, suitable for vaping. We are currently testing a range of IMR and NMC cells in the German community: You can find the testing here: RE: SabbelMR's IMR Akku-Probierrunde - 42 .

    The important thing is that there ARE indeed alternatives to the AW brand, especially in the 18650 size: Panasonic CGR18650CH, BAK B18650CC, Sony US18650V3.

    When reading the diagram (The second one titled "Messungen auf Hyperion..." is our result diagram) please refer to the violet part of the bars. That's the capacity at 5 Ampere result.

    You might not be aware of the NMC chemistry - that is a hybrid of the classic IMR and the classic ICR, basically a safe chemistry with higher capacity. Look here: Types of Lithium-ion Batteries

    We are not yet finished with the testing, and a final result is not yet known, but we already identifed usable cells, some are even better than the AWs in our frame of usage.

    We are waiting for a new sample for the BDLs - they have had too high variance in results.

    18650:
    Panasonic CGR18650CH
    BAK B18650CC
    AW IMR18650-1600 (For mechanical PVs not worse than the -2000)
    AW IMR18650-2000 (For regulated PVs a hair better than the -1600)
    Sony US18650V3 (Very new cell, might not be available yet)

    18490/18500:
    AW IMR18490-1100
    BDL IMR18500-1100


    18350:
    BDL IMR18350-800
    AW IMR18350-700

    16340:
    AW IMR16340-550

    14500:
    AW IMR14500-600
    ufo, Mudflap, Della Cirque and 3 others like this.

  10. #20
    PV Master Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Supporting Member
    pianoguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Apple Valley, MN
    Posts
    4,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'm on my first day with these, and so far, so good. I just switched out the battery after about 10.5 hours and 3 ml of juice, and it read 3.72.

Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks