+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 62
510 - All The Rave? in E-Cigarette Product Reviews; I can't compare the 510 to a 901 (Don't own one) personally but will give my thoughts. The 510 The ...
  1. #41
    Full Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    US, AZ
    Posts
    90

    Default

    I can't compare the 510 to a 901 (Don't own one) personally but will give my thoughts.

    The 510

    The Positive:
    • Atomizers seem to be very solid if taken care of. I can't tell you when they die because I still am using one for almost 2 months. Janty picked a great name with "Dura"
    • Vapor production is great especially for such a small atty
    • Will suck a cart dry if used correctly and topped off
    • Doesn't leak much unless you really overfill it.
    • It's very small
    • When atomizer is faulty, will not cause a harsh burnt metal taste. From my experience these attys either work or they don't.
    The Negative:
    • Battery life is very poor. You will need about 3-4 batteries for an 8 hour period (PCC and good USB Passthrough is highly recommended)
    • You must drip or top off very often if not using a cart mod. The cart is very small and doesn't hold very much liquid.
    • Blank carts are slightly more expensive if buying in bulk
    • Draw is slow and hard compared to 801 and drags take a bit longer to produce a ton of vapor (Small atty surface area)

    That is all I could think of off the top of my head at the moment. Hope it helps!

    Also:
    The manual switch is highly recommended for this model. There seems to be so many issues with the auto from what I have read.

    Note: I only have 2 801 models to compare the 510 to.

  2. Advertisement
  3. #42
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield, Ohio
    Posts
    251

    Default

    I started vaping with the 901. I recently started using the 510, I do have to admit I like the 510 better then the 901. as far as the batteries I have found IMO that the batteries last about the same amount of time. I do feel the the vapor and throat hit is better with a 510. The cartridge does hold more juice and last longer than the 901. I definitely love the manual batteries over the auto batteries.

  4. #43
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Florida,USA
    Posts
    35

    Default

    I just received my 510 three days ago. I love the manual switch.

    I also just ordered the PCC since the battery life is horrible for a heavy vaper such as myself.

    Other than that I have no complaints so far.

  5. #44
    Super Member ECF Veteran STILLSMOK9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Esoteric State of America
    Posts
    985

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArizonaVapin View Post
    I can't compare the 510 to a 901 (Don't own one) personally but will give my thoughts.

    The 510

    The Positive:
    • Atomizers seem to be very solid if taken care of. I can't tell you when they die because I still am using one for almost 2 months. Janty picked a great name with "Dura"
    • Vapor production is great especially for such a small atty
    • Will suck a cart dry if used correctly and topped off
    • Doesn't leak much unless you really overfill it.
    • It's very small
    • When atomizer is faulty, will not cause a harsh burnt metal taste. From my experience these attys either work or they don't.
    The Negative:
    • Battery life is very poor. You will need about 3-4 batteries for an 8 hour period (PCC and good USB Passthrough is highly recommended)
    • You must drip or top off very often if not using a cart mod. The cart is very small and doesn't hold very much liquid.
    • Blank carts are slightly more expensive if buying in bulk
    • Draw is slow and hard compared to 801 and drags take a bit longer to produce a ton of vapor (Small atty surface area)

    That is all I could think of off the top of my head at the moment. Hope it helps!

    Also:
    The manual switch is highly recommended for this model. There seems to be so many issues with the auto from what I have read.

    Note: I only have 2 801 models to compare the 510 to.
    Interesting what you are saying about the carts not holding much liquid!

    I thought that was one of it's strengths?

  6. #45
    Super Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    324

    Default

    Well, that's compared to 901s...
    510 carts are bigger, but you should also think that 510 attys are rather juice hungry. More vapor = more juice used = more frequent top-offs.

  7. #46
    Super Member ECF Veteran STILLSMOK9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Esoteric State of America
    Posts
    985

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lachesis View Post
    Well, that's compared to 901s...
    510 carts are bigger, but you should also think that 510 attys are rather juice hungry. More vapor = more juice used = more frequent top-offs.
    Very good point, plus, I vape low mg nic, which lends to me vaping non-stop

  8. #47
    Full Member ECF Veteran DigDreams's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Oldsmar, FL
    Posts
    140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by emus View Post
    The 510 auto battery produces excellent vapor with minimal drag by using pulsing your drag as opposed to a long steady drag.
    Yes, that works - but it is not a pleasant way to vape in my opinion. I have both and I think that if you want a 510, get manual batteries - the auto batteries for the 510 are garbage (2 second cutoff on all that I tried). All those little puffs just burn juice and I feel like an old steam powered locomotive. I prefer a single 3-4 second draw myself.

  9. #48
    Sar
    Sar is offline
    Super Member ECF Veteran Sar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RazorNribbonz View Post
    ... The passthrough still s*cks compared to my 901 and 401 PT's...Only in that it nose dives in production after a while..Where as the other two don't.....To be fair, my PT had a faulty battery, replaced it ..much better but still not as consistant as my 901-401..However, you can unplug the 510 PT and still vape off of it for a few hrs, which is cool....But, I'm not trying to be too judgemental yet ..Untill I try the second PT...
    Did you try the second PT? I have two passthroughs for 510 from two different suppliers, but they both look identical. And both PTs are terrible. I actually find myself taking a primer puff just to see if the passthrough works. I hope puresmoker gets the new PT with 510 connectors soon!

  10. #49
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    45

    Default

    How about the charging time?

  11. #50
    Senior Member ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    USA, TampaBay, FL
    Posts
    194

    Thumbs up

    I got my manual 510 and PCC today. I love it so far. I have used a penstyle and a 901. What I noticed right off the bat is how much different the juice tastes. My penstyle gives a powerful throat hit and I like that, but I didn't realize what people meant about the taste you lose with a penstyle until I got the 510. I didn't realize you could get a great throat hit AND flavor. I love the idea of having a portable power source. The only issue so far with the PCC is that my batteries are too short to activate the charger when I close the lid. I cut a piece of sticky foam insulation and stuck it to the inside of the lid. Someone posted that fix in a different thread. It works. I haven't noticed any burning taste from the cart. I guess I'm one of the lucky ones. I love this thing. Special thanks to Surf Monkey for the great review that helped me decide to get one.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

SEO by vBSEO