![]() |
| | #1 |
| Super Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Esoteric State of America
Posts: 896
|
I have been vaping for 2.5 months now. My first and only e-cig was the Npro(RN4081). I have been viewing here that this is an inferior product. In lieu to this idea I recently ordered a DSE901 which I have been hearing rave reviews on. I have not received it yet, but, I got, to tell you in retrospect that this RN 4081 is quite a Diehard. To date I am still on original batts and atty. The vape and throat hit are still tremendous. This little 901 has some big shoes to fill!! I understand it may have a smoother hit or something, but, can anyone comment on its durability? Especially the attys? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| US Supplier Forum Sponsor Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Orlando
Posts: 543
|
RN4081 is a super mini, Dse-901 is a regular mini. It depends on the way you vape. I would think the battery on the DSE-901 would hold a larger charge as well as having a slightly larger cartidge.
__________________ www.eSmokerOnline.com Code ECF for 5% off. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| - |
There is a lot of confusion on these forums with regards to the 4081. It is actually a very good product but many people are unable to separate the ridiculous prices that are charged from the actual performance. I went through the same thing as you and bought into the hype about the 901 and to be perfectly honest I found it to be no better than the 4081 in performance. The only noticeable difference for me was that the 901 I got was totally unreliable. Both batteries and the atomizer from my starter kit have all died in under a month. DW |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Super Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Esoteric State of America
Posts: 896
| Quote:
My main concern is the atty? I'm still on original RN 4081 and it is kickin. I do regularly blow it our and sit it on its non-batt side.. | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Super Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Esoteric State of America
Posts: 896
|
I hate that!! :'('' Was hoping to find something better in functionality, as well as depedability.. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| US Supplier Forum Sponsor Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Orlando
Posts: 543
|
In my experience through alot of china dealers the Dse-901 Batteries seem to be the culprit of bad performance.The atomizers seem to be good (I have never had a Dse-901 atomizer dead on arrival) but have had the batteries blinking and dead when I bought them.
__________________ www.eSmokerOnline.com Code ECF for 5% off. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| - |
JMHO but I think the best upgrade from a 4081 without giving up the e-cig form factor is a manually switched 510. DW |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 239
|
No argument from me on the RN4081. I have an NPRO and a PeeWee, all batteries and atomizers going strong for 2-1/2+ months (my husband is using the NPRO now, but he still hasn't given up analogs). I mostly use a pass-through, though, since I work at home. *Love* the passthrough! I've been tempted to get the 510, since I've read such rave reviews, but until we know what's going to happen with the #$*@(# FDA, I think I'll just buy stuff for the model I already own. And really, I'm very happy with the RN4081 ... nothing to compare it with, but hey, I have no desire for an analog! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| US Supplier Forum Sponsor Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Orlando
Posts: 543
|
The problem with me on the super minis is it seems you need to top off after 40 puffs?
__________________ www.eSmokerOnline.com Code ECF for 5% off. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 239
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|