Sorry to intrude

- Am I the ONLY one that has a problem with the people saying they review these products, and if they are awful they let the supplier decide if they should post a bad review or send it back? I don't find that unbiased reviewing at all. I have no quams with any of the people doing reviews (I'm a review whore actually), but I am a little put off by this. I think you guys should review each and every product you get and let us know if it sucks!
I am gonna use Spikey for this example as she is a girl and although she could probably kick my @ss I feel as though I would have a better chance against her as opposed to igetcha or Terra.
So lets say Spikey gets a 4081 from Cash to review - Spikey does her thing (and does it well I might add). She decides "you know this thing really sucks". She contacts Steve and says "hey dude - I was about to do this reveiw for your 4081, but this thing sucks". Steve says to Spikey shhhh don't tell anyone send it back to me. Spikey sends it back. A day or two later I'm drunk and stumbling around on Steve's site and think hell I own about every other thing this guys has, I think I'll have a go at this 4081. Now I have just bought a crappy product that had I known Spikey's opinion of I probably wouldn't have bought it. Does this make sense to anyone? (damn I'm rambling again).
On a side note - I own a pilot and a evo. In my opinion these cigs are like night and day (the wife says so too). With the evo I am constantly hitting the cutoff? I have to wait atleast 2 minutes b4 I can even attempt to take another drag. Is this normal? With the pilot I just smoke. I have never had any issues with a cutoff (except with loud music, car windows,ect.). Also, the hit I get from the pilot atomizer is definatley different than the evo. Sorry, just my honest opinion.
Oh - I did by the evo off of a member of the forums. It was not from intellicig (but was in their box, ect). Maybe it was a older version?
Bookmarks