e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > Health and Medical Issues > Other Alternatives to Smoking > Smokeless tobacco
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2009, 03:00 AM   #61
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

I tolerated the Offroad Coffee Vanilla. It was the best Offroad. The new CatchDry Vanilla Mint isn't bad. I hope the reference was to that one.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 05:29 AM   #62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Default

I like the Vanilla Mint minis myself. I also have made a small change on my list of SNUS I REFUSE TO PURCHASE. I have changed the Offroad entry to exclude purchases of portions, but not loose. The Offroad los comes highly recommended in many quarters.
WerkIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 12:03 AM   #63
ECF Veteran
 
paladinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 351
Default

They say snus is healthier because of the manufacturing process. But it has been said that american tobacco contains lower tsna's now then it did in the past.

I think the biggest concern for any smokeless tobacco is risks of heart disease. There was a very large study, the biggest to date done on swedish snus users on something like 100 thousand construction workers. They concluded that snus gave users a 40 percent increase in cardiovascular disease and death than non tobacco users. I could be wrong, but the risk seemed to be higher for snus users then cigarette users within a certain age range.

Now later studies, that were much smaller have contradicted this, and said that there is no real risk between CVD and snus. Some claim the figures found in the large negative study dealt with a snus that had higher tsnas than they did today. who really knows. I just know that the study that said Snus gave you a 40 percent risk, was the largest study ever done. And I believe it holds some weight or at least some consideration. More modern studies have been funded partially or entirely by swedish match, so take those with a grain of salt.

what i get from it is this. Overall the risks of snus are probably lower than american tobacco, especially cigarettes, but dont have the snus in your mouth all day long all the time, because there might be some cardiovascular risks with over use.
paladinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 12:39 AM   #64
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paladinx View Post
I think the biggest concern for any smokeless tobacco is risks of heart disease. There was a very large study, the biggest to date done on swedish snus users on something like 100 thousand construction workers. They concluded that snus gave users a 40 percent increase in cardiovascular disease and death than non tobacco users. I could be wrong, but the risk seemed to be higher for snus users then cigarette users within a certain age range.
Check this summary of several studies in pdf format, which addresses cardiovascular risk. It notes other studies undertaken since the one you cited, which claim the opposite:

"However, two subsequent case-control studies by Huhtasarri and others (footnotes 40-41) did not find a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction among snus users as compared to as compared to non-tobacco users. Both of these studies were based on data collected in Northern Sweden as part of the World Heatlth Organization MONICA (multinational monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular diseases ) project.....

....In multivariate anaylses smoking remained significatnly associated with MI, whereas snus use was not.....

........Huhtasarri subsequently conducted a larger study than the one reported in 1992...this study found.....that cigarette smoking significantly increased risk of an MI (statistics cited) whereas snus use significantly REDUCED the risk (statistics cited) compared with men who never became regular tobacco users." (Check page 4 of the link and read paragraphs 5-7 under the 'Cardiovascular Disease" section to read the above quote in full with statistics.)
WerkIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 01:01 AM   #65
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

Good stuff, both of you. In the past two years, since I quit cigarettes, I've read almost daily on nicotine. I want studies on nicotine consumption, apart from smoking. Hard to find and many are new. But what is evolving is the notion that nicotine has dangers and benefits. If that's so, we need to know where the line is drawn. At what blood level does it become a detriment to health, particularly cardiovascular health; how much might help keep us mentally alert into old age, etc.

And if it has benefits, then the best way to obtain those benefits for us is with snus or nasal snuff -- centuries old methods of tobacco use, without serious consequences for users. In the future, I bet Big Pharma will identify that optimal dose of nicotine and sell us all pills at $10 a pop. Leading up to that will be further restrictions and banning of products containing natural nicotine.

Keep posting your findings. Many could benefit from this collective knowledge.

Last edited by TropicalBob; 06-30-2009 at 01:03 AM.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 01:41 AM   #66
Senior Member
 
ladybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: northern calif.
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TropicalBob View Post
Ladybug, your list has some of the snus I consider the WORST made. Begin with the Power Elyxyr. It tastes awful, hits too hard and can make you physically ill. I managed to finish the tin I ordered, but gave it an extremely negative review on snuson.com and vowed to never put another one of those in my mouth.

Stay far away from anything labeled sterk. No Thunder, ever. These are far, far too strong for you, now and probably forever. You need a General Mini Mint.

Offroad is yucky stuff, period. The Oomph Licorice/Honey is not bad; ditto the Citrus/Menthol. The Wine and Dine is tasteless and you might get along with that.

Burning of the gums is common. Hiccups are common with stronger snus. You just need to get far away from the idea that more nicotine in snus is better. It isn't and you won't likely like any of the "sterk" or "strong" varieties.

P.S. Robert, if you don't like sweet Camel, you most certainly won't like Swedish snus. They taste far more like tobacco than the Camel product. Have you ever used chew? Camel Snus really doesn't taste like any chew I know of.
Hi TropicalBob,I consider you to be a great source of information about all things nicotene,so I thank you for the info you gave meI am going to check out snuson.com,is that where you get your snuss at? I am more into minty,sweet flavors,so I have no idea why I picked extra sterk! Don't even know what sterk means...LOL! Haven't been brave enough to try it yetThe reason i picked the snus I did was trying for high nicotene content,and your right,more nic isn't going to make it better if I can't use it. So,as always I'm open to ideas and suggestions! P.S. I used my vanilla mint snus at work today,no one knew and it is better than the slimy commit lozenges that I have been using with my ecigs
ladybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 02:40 AM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
Hi TropicalBob,I consider you to be a great source of information about all things nicotene,
I agree 100%, because T-Bob sticks with FACTS instead of suppositions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
I am going to check out snuson.com,is that where you get your snuss at?
Snuson is to snus as these forums are to e-cigs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
Don't even know what sterk means.
Sterk means 'strong,' as in a higher level of nicotine. I don't claim to have any ability or right to speak for T-Bob, but to me, I hear him advocating for moderation in the use of nicotine, although I could be wrong.
WerkIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 03:05 AM   #68
Senior Member
 
ladybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: northern calif.
Posts: 266
Default

Thanx for you input Werkit! I take it you also use snuss? If so what do you enjoy? Also what ecigs are you using? I have janty stick, and I really like the ecigars for lots of vape and throat hit
ladybug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 03:18 AM   #69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
Thanx for you input Werkit!
You are welcome. I don't know everything, but do the best I can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
I take it you also use snuss?
Snus is now my primary form of nicotine, although I originally quit analogs with e-cigs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
If so what do you enjoy?
White mini portions are my preferred snus, primarily because they only contain 4 mg of nicotine (except for Mocca, which has 5 mg) and white portions have a slower release and therefore, softer nic hit. I require low levels of nicotine, which was true even when I smoked analogs. I am experimenting with loose, aka 'los' presently, although I only have two tins of it. I am growing my own tobacco to make snus, so will need to learn to work with los.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybug View Post
Also what ecigs are you using?
I have a RN4081 which has a dead atomizer. The joy306A set still puts out. Now, I only hit the e-cig late at night before bed, so as not to waste a snus portion. I mix my own e-liquids using glycerine and Fairie's Finest Creme De Cafe extract, which is kahlua flavored, which I mix down to 4 mg or less, from a 24 mg tasteless commercial e-liquid.
WerkIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 02:53 PM   #70
ECF Veteran
 
TropicalBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Port Charlotte, FL USA
Posts: 5,076
Default

WerkIt and I are so alike ...

Ladybug, taste is such an individual matter that it's really difficult to say what you might like among the ones that I dislike. Fortunately, snus is not prohibitively expensive, so a failure is not like, say, regretting that Screwdriver e-cig purchase.

The bottom line is that nicotine, like caffeine, is bitter. Its natural purpose is to drive away insects that threaten its host. Tobacco is full of the bitter stuff, so tobacconists go to some lengths to modify their products so they taste better. (Notice how many coffee flavors there are today?). The more a snus tastes like tobacco, the more bitter it will be. And bitter is an acquired taste (we have sweet, salty, sour and bitter tastes on this earth). I like sweet and/or salty, so the sweeter snus is right up my alley.

No matter which you like, you're better off than smoking cigarettes, of course. The snus history is a great one, free of alarming spikes in cancer, emphysema, etc. among users. And e-cigs remain an unknown, with far too few tests done and none of them peer-reviewed and approved. So I want to continue to encourage you towards snus use. If you must have nicotine -- and I must -- then find the safest known source that satisfies you.

Last edited by TropicalBob; 06-30-2009 at 02:55 PM.
TropicalBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184