Product reviews censored ?
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Majestic

Thread: Product reviews censored ?

  1. #1
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Majestic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    N.E. Wisconsin
    Posts
    940

    Default Product reviews censored ?

    Early this summer I wrote a negative review regarding the WOW disposable. At the time I had purchased one disposable and later received another one free for ordering. In both instances they had poor battery life (30 - 35 puffs each) and I wrote a review that reflected my experience. To date that review has never been posted. Makes me think the V4L reviews aren't a true reflection of the products sold.

    I did receive a free complimentary WOW disposable when I inquired about the problem I was experiencing. That disposable had a much better battery life (150 puffs). My guess it was newer stock. I didn't bother writing a review on that one since my other review was never posted.
    ibndevilish likes this.
    DSE-901 Owner & Operator
    Since March 2009

  2. #2
    Ultra Member ECF Veteran K9Luvr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Hampton, VA
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    wouldn't be surprised if they didn't publish it.

  3. #3
    Supplier Associate ECF Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Northbrook, Ill, USA
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Majestic View Post
    Early this summer I wrote a negative review regarding the WOW disposable. At the time I had purchased one disposable and later received another one free for ordering. In both instances they had poor battery life (30 - 35 puffs each) and I wrote a review that reflected my experience. To date that review has never been posted. Makes me think the V4L reviews aren't a true reflection of the products sold.

    I did receive a free complimentary WOW disposable when I inquired about the problem I was experiencing. That disposable had a much better battery life (150 puffs). My guess it was newer stock. I didn't bother writing a review on that one since my other review was never posted.
    Hi Majestic,
    I''m glad to hear that your 3rd disposable worked well. The reviews have to be moderated before posting them because otherwise we get spam. Thank you for writing reviews, they are very helpful. Please private message me the name you used when writing the review and i'll look into it for you.
    Last edited by oO_Gab727_Oo; 08-15-2014 at 09:07 PM.

  4. #4
    Super Member Verified Member
    ECF Veteran
    Majestic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    N.E. Wisconsin
    Posts
    940

    Default

    No need to PM. Review name was the same as I use here.

    After the good performance of the third disposable I did a little dissection on the two poor performers and gave both their batteries a charge. Yes, the batteries are rechargeable. When fully charged, one lasted for 146 puffs while the other did 162. That would lead me to believe either they weren't fully charged from the factory or had been on the shelf for a while.
    DSE-901 Owner & Operator
    Since March 2009

  5. #5
    Full Member venomous voice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Milwaukee WI
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Its not only reviews that get censored, it seems any negative comments get the boot.... I responded to a thread about the smileomizer issue there, and haven't been able to post without moderator review since!!!
    Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.






  6. #6
    Senior Member Verified Member ibndevilish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Torrington ,CT
    Posts
    181

    Default

    This company also does it with the juice also. I USED to be a customer and had probs with one of the juices and wrote a review 3 different times and it never posted. I no longer do business with a company that doesn't allow for real people to do a review. I have since found a few good companies that allow honest reviews. I spent 20.00 on juice and ended up with the same juice lot they sent. If you think something is wrong with a juice and send it back to be tested ( they had me send it back ) to only have that company send the same lot number where the juice can have something wrong with it is just wrong. I sent all my juice back and told them to keep it.