e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat

Go Back   e-cigarette-forum.com • The place for electronic cigarette reviews, news and chat > The E-Cigarette > Electronic Cigarette Reviews > Video-Reviews
Connect with Facebook
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2009, 12:57 PM   #1
Super Member
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 1,840
Blog Entries: 18
Default Adaptever Review/ Switch Removal

Alright well I kept this one really brief. I'm also attaching some information I got off AdapteveR Home of the ORIGINAL USA built PV : Home

"Features

-Machined and designed in the USA for durability and easy user maintenance...

-All parts are made from the highest quality materials, including T-6061 aluminum(aircraft quality), brass, and non-porous acetal***,

-The AdapteveR is ROHS compliant

-NEVER an ounce of solder, only solid electrical connections throughout... never worry about a soldered wire coming loose or breaking, because the AdapteveR doesn't use solder or wires...

-Did you know? The same model atomizer from different manufacturers can fit differently in some PV adapters... This can result in less power or not working at all... The AdapteveR has you covered with a unique double spring mechanism that always insures full power with whatever atomizer you choose

-User replaceable switch, (1 extra included)

Batteries

The AdapteveR supports CR123 batteries with lengths from 1.300" ~ 1.420" or 33mm ~ 36mm....

recommended protected battery****

recommended battery charger****

Whats Included

Included with purchase:
(1)AdapteveR assy
(2)push button switch**
(2)battery spring*
(2)set screws*
(1)switch removal tool
(batteries and atomizers -not included)

Technical

*supplied in the event the part is lost or damaged
**switch life is rated @ 50,000 mechanical/100,000 electrical presses
***Acetron® GP is Quadrant™s general purpose copolymer acetal and is the only porosity-free acetal product available today. Acetron® GP is FDA, USDA, NSF, Canada AG and 3A-Dairy compliant.

**** for safety protected CR123 batteries are recommended for use with the AdapteveR..."







(sorry guys if the video quality is poor i think i forgot to record this one in HD)
__________________
If you're intellectually challenged and aren't capable of communicating in a civil manner try not to reply to my posts.
"A rat who gnaws at a cat's tail invites destruction"

Last edited by Crash; 08-07-2009 at 07:13 PM. Reason: added the follow up video
Crash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 01:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
blackbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 233
Default

You look really bummed!

I've been looking at all the mods. Almost got a screwdriver earlier. But my torchmod batteries came this morning, so I'll stick with that.

I've got an hour of moderate use (sitting at home desk) and now the battery is getting weaker. This is with the batteries straight out the packet. Not charged yet.

What sort of life are you getting?
blackbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 01:15 PM   #3
Super Member
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 1,840
Blog Entries: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackbug View Post
You look really bummed!

I've been looking at all the mods. Almost got a screwdriver earlier. But my torchmod batteries came this morning, so I'll stick with that.

I've got an hour of moderate use (sitting at home desk) and now the battery is getting weaker. This is with the batteries straight out the packet. Not charged yet.

What sort of life are you getting?
On the torch mod with a full battery around 4-5 hours of good vaping
Didn't bother with this just put it back for now, bit let down, but since its using the same batteries as the SD should get the same amount of power/battery life around 6-7 hours is the norm for me.
__________________
If you're intellectually challenged and aren't capable of communicating in a civil manner try not to reply to my posts.
"A rat who gnaws at a cat's tail invites destruction"
Crash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 04:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
blackbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 233
Default

On the second battery still. This one has been going since I sent that last email. So almost 4 hours and more to go. Again another one out the packet that I haven't charged.

I approve. (And should probably posting this in the torch mod review thread!)
blackbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 05:10 PM   #5
Supporting Member
 
Zofryer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Near DC
Posts: 1,076
Default

The point you made about the vapor production not really differing is dead on. In the end of the day, it's a matter of factoring everything else in my opinion:

*Look
*Form Factor
*Button Feel
*Construction
*Durability
*Ease of repair
*Features
*Value

How this particlar mod stacks up in those areas are the exact reasons I picked this over other mods for a dedicated 510 battery supply. From a vapor production standpoint, it should be identical to the SD, Nano, Protege, etc with the same atomizer. One caveat, the Protege is not released yet, or I'd have strongly considered it based upon my positive experience with the Prodigy. Also, I have not tried the Nano yet but do have a GGT and 510 adapter coming.
__________________

http://zofryer.com
Zofryer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 06:04 PM   #6
Super Member
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 1,840
Blog Entries: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zofryer View Post
The point you made about the vapor production not really differing is dead on. In the end of the day, it's a matter of factoring everything else in my opinion:

*Look
*Form Factor
*Button Feel
*Construction
*Durability
*Ease of repair
*Features
*Value

How this particlar mod stacks up in those areas are the exact reasons I picked this over other mods for a dedicated 510 battery supply. From a vapor production standpoint, it should be identical to the SD, Nano, Protege, etc with the same atomizer. One caveat, the Protege is not released yet, or I'd have strongly considered it based upon my positive experience with the Prodigy. Also, I have not tried the Nano yet but do have a GGT and 510 adapter coming.
I man whats up?? I'm glad we agree on something, I didn't want people to thinking I was just hating on this ecig, so I kept it brief, and thats why I also got some information from the site. It is value for money though, and i love the fact that its all mechanical, so in theory it should last for ever if the switch is replaced and regular maintenance is performed. I think I was just really disappointed because I had my hopes set really high. There is an extension sleeve for this coming out soon from what I'm told, but then once again It's going to be just another 6v mod. The performance will no doubt be the same, so I think from now on to judge mods I'll do it on looks, how much I paid for it and if it was worth it, what features it offers, okay well pretty much all things you said in your list. I think the form factor is what killed it on this one for me, I like things that stand out and are different.
__________________
If you're intellectually challenged and aren't capable of communicating in a civil manner try not to reply to my posts.
"A rat who gnaws at a cat's tail invites destruction"
Crash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 06:11 PM   #7
Supporting Member
 
Zofryer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Near DC
Posts: 1,076
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash View Post
I think the form factor is what killed it on this one for me, I like things that stand out and are different.
You just made another important distinction. Form factor is subjective. To you, this design was boring because it did not stand out. I completely understand that. However, to me this design rocked because it didn't needlessly stand out. : ) I like less is more. Neither of us are right, it's a preference.
__________________

http://zofryer.com
Zofryer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 06:18 PM   #8
Super Member
 
Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 1,840
Blog Entries: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zofryer View Post
You just made another important distinction. Form factor is subjective. To you, this design was boring because it did not stand out. I completely understand that. However, to me this design rocked because it didn't needlessly stand out. : ) I like less is more. Neither of us are right, it's a preference.
Exactly so everyone find something that you think is value for money and appeals to your eyes, the performance on all the mods is just about the same (since they're pushing the same amount of volts to the atty.) The adaptever is very reasonably priced in my opinion, and all mechanical. Those two points are a winner for, but I guess my bling bling side kicked in and well yea. But I'll cherish it just as much as my other mods gota respect the work that went into making it, and the design of the switch, and atomizers area. Honestly love the fact that you can take the whole thing apart yourself and put it back together.
__________________
If you're intellectually challenged and aren't capable of communicating in a civil manner try not to reply to my posts.
"A rat who gnaws at a cat's tail invites destruction"
Crash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
© ECF 2007 to 2009 ψ Ω

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184