i suppose I should update this little record. there is a wealth of information on this forum and a collection of incredibly interesting people, everybody has a story. I like reading the stories and I get a kick out of expounding my opinions. I have found a group of mostly like minded people. It would appear that the contributors are a collection of varied individuals, some are funny, some seem especially knowledgable some are angry and some are frightened, a cross section of humanity. I find myself in agreement with many and in disagreement with a few.
I don't think there is any reason at all to restrict the sales to 18 year olds in fact I think it makes the ecig movement a tobacco movement, the emphasis on the age restriction causes me to wonder if the whole ecig movement is BT in disguise, it is too slick opens the door to an adult only product thereby facilitating taxation and rips off the teens. In my opinion it is bad psychology or agenda psychology. I also question the ecig / vaping confusion I wonder if this also muddies the waters and that is in fact the purpose which would also cause enough confusion to permit excessive taxation. The angel side of the argument is that nobody would understand what vaping was and all would understand what an ecig was however the confusion in the name raises my BS factor as does the age restriction emphasis.
The benefit of the vape though is real enough and the genuine seeking to assist each other and provide an alternative for the greater community is real enough. Just my thoughts on things at the moment.
I don't think there is any reason at all to restrict the sales to 18 year olds in fact I think it makes the ecig movement a tobacco movement, the emphasis on the age restriction causes me to wonder if the whole ecig movement is BT in disguise, it is too slick opens the door to an adult only product thereby facilitating taxation and rips off the teens. In my opinion it is bad psychology or agenda psychology. I also question the ecig / vaping confusion I wonder if this also muddies the waters and that is in fact the purpose which would also cause enough confusion to permit excessive taxation. The angel side of the argument is that nobody would understand what vaping was and all would understand what an ecig was however the confusion in the name raises my BS factor as does the age restriction emphasis.
The benefit of the vape though is real enough and the genuine seeking to assist each other and provide an alternative for the greater community is real enough. Just my thoughts on things at the moment.
