Real Life temp measurements inside a 2016 era atty

OK, as promised I ran some tests using a thermocouple on a Merlin rta to get some real life temperature measurements inside of a modern atty under real use.

test1_zpsqpns6bv2.jpg


I threaded a .010" thermocouple (click link for source) through the airhole up into the chamber

test2_zpsllml14pw.jpg


I tucked just the end up underneath the center coil.

test3_zpsymn2myho.jpg


I hooked it up to a Temp Controller that accepts type-k thermocouples. This controller was checked against a Fluke 725 Process Calibrator that is traceable to the NIST, and is within calibration date expiration.

test4_zpspsecpug9.jpg


Fluke 725 Process Calibrator used to calibrate/certify the AutomationDiirect Solo Temperature Controller
upload_2017-5-15_10-59-1.png


Calibration data showing NIST traceability:
upload_2017-5-15_8-56-5.png






I set the DNA250 to 400F (the insulation of the thermocouple is limited to 500f) and fired the mod while capturing the thermocouple and Evolv's Device Monitor at the same time.

test5_zpsi4iradoo.jpg


The coil was a 5/6 wrap of 26AWG SS430 around a 3mm drillbit and ohmed out to be 0.317ohms. Used a TCR curve from Steam-Engine, SS430 works well in Watts mode too.

Wick material was rayon, packed firmly inside the coil, and packed lightly inside the juice wells..

I have the airflow and juiceflow wide open for every test unless explicitly stated. I then vaped the tank normally (for me which is a strong MTL style).

The liquid is a 36mg 50/50 mix with no flavor or other additives except nic.

Discovered a couple of things:
  • The thermocouple data acquisition software limited me in that it only had a sample rate of 1 sec, where Evolv's DM is about 10 times as fast.
  • The thermocouple had a lag as compared to Evolv's resistance derived measurements. The lag makes sense though, the coil has to heat up first, then the mass of sensor will heat up.
  • Nonetheless, the max temp measured by the thermocouple was about 390. Evolv claims +/- 10 degrees so that was within tolerance, barely.
  • I measured off the center coil in this series, about 6-7 tests, the results were very repeatable.
At any rate, this proved to me that Evolv's DNA is accurate at the temp being used in these tests.


WATTS MODE
So, to correlate this for folks running in straight watts mode without TC:
  • SS 430 coil, 26 awg, a 5/6 wrap, 3mm diameter, 0.317 ohms, rayon wick
  • In Temp Mode it started out at 20w, and after 1sec dropped to 15 watts to maintain 400 degrees
So out of curiosity I set the mod to watts mode at 15 watts and chained vaped a few hits.
  • First hit was 400 degrees
  • Each successive chain vape got a little hotter at the same 15 watts. By the third hit I was getting 440.
Backs up the concept of TC, as TC would have reduced the wattage to keep it from going over 400.
upload_2017-5-4_10-12-26.png



Same 15 watts in watts mode:
  • 1st hit was airflow control closed off to a minimal MTL setting
  • 2nd hit was with airflow opened up (keep in mind that, as shown above, a second hit is normally hotter with all else being equal)
More airflow cooled the coil.

upload_2017-5-4_10-9-22.png



Depending on the coil, airflow, chain vape, etc, it doesnt take much wattage to get high temps.


Testing the ends of coil vs center:
upload_2017-5-4_10-16-42.png


upload_2017-5-4_10-16-54.png


Placed sensor under far right coil, it was significantly cooler (about 290) at the same 400 degree setting.

I suspected it would be though, the wick is always more scorched in the middle than on the outside.


Temp in center of the wick
OK, so I stuck the sensor into the middle of the wick, pushed in so the tip of the sensor is inserted to the middle of the coil lengthwise.

upload_2017-4-22_12-41-49-png.650935


upload_2017-4-22_12-42-24-png.650939


So this is the temp the juice sees in the middle of the wick:
  • Normal 3 sec puffs
  • Same 400 degree TC setting
  • 1st puff the center of the wick only got up to 252 degrees.
  • Successive puffs kept the wick temp rising
  • Also, if you increase the puff length, the center of the wick continues to rise.
So,
  • It would appear that juice inside the wick does not get heated as hot as the coil.
  • With single hits the wick stays pretty cool, but with chain hits the wick approaches the coil temp. TC only limits the coil temp, but the wick temp is not being directly controlled.

upload_2017-4-22_12-40-2-png.650933




Effects of wick saturation
Ok, so all of my tests were done with the juice control wide open to ensure good wick saturation


At 15watts with juice flow wide open:
upload_2017-4-22_13-19-28-png.650957



At 15watts with juice flow closed down (note, not a dry, or even bad tasting hit):

upload_2017-4-22_13-14-28-png.650953



At 20 watts with juice control throttled back:
The 2nd and 3rd hits tasted slightly burnt to me, not dry hits. So I would say that yes, I taste "something" when you get over 500 degrees.

upload_2017-4-22_13-21-39-png.650967


Not going to push the wattage up anymore as the insulation of the sensor cant handle any hotter.

I didnt do a screen capture of it but at 15w the wick center maxed out at about 400 degrees after several chains vapes. The temp was still increasing slightly with each chain hit, but the ROR (rate of rise) with each hit had almost leveled out. I quit after about 6 hits.


So, some conclusions:
  • Coil temp did coincide with DNA board setting at 400F.
  • Chain vaping in wattage mode clearly increased temp with each hit
  • Longer hits in wattage mode clearly increased temp
  • Less air or juice flow clearly increased temp in wattage mode
  • I personally didnt taste anything "bad" until over 500 degrees, but it was detectable above that point
  • Under normal vaping (not chain), the center of the wick was considerably cooler than the coil
  • Depending on the coil/juice/air it doesnt take much wattage to get over 400 degrees, and I didnt taste anything bad until you hit 500.
Now, if you couple that with the information in the Wang study, where pg/vg were measured at specific temperatures, it does lead to the premise of staying under 410 degrees for maximum safety, especially if you have a high vg mix.

Specifically, I could not "taste" the area highlighted in yellow below.

upload_2017-4-22_13-59-36-png.650991

© Wang





©2017 Mike Petro. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Comments

Great info Mike, thanks for the time and effort to do these tests for us all.

I would be interested in seeing one more test using the exact same setup except using dry cotton. . If that setup begins to lightly brown the dry cotton in the center of the coil at 420°f you can be certain that the SE TFR Curve values (.csv file) matches the SS wire you are using in your temp test. Otherwise your temp tests are valueless ie not all SS wire exhibits the same tfr value at a given temp (manufacturer metallurgical variances) and can easily skew your readings by >15°f in either direction.
 
Ahhhh but really it is irrelevant as most of the measurements were done with a thermocouple. The TCR curve has nothing to do with what was physically measured by that type-k thermocouple.

My thermocouple readings were accurate within +/- 0.8°C as validated against a Fluke 725 Process Calibrator that has a current NIST traceable Certificate of Calibration.

I may try the cotton test some day, but I dont use cotton, and dont have a feel for it. I do trust the thermocouple though, as I can test it against known scientific standards.
 
Aaaah, but the thermocouple tells only actual temp, not whether a DNA controls temp setting accurately. In order to prove that you first have to ensure that the wire and cvs curves match.
Example: say your wire tfr at 420°f is low due to mfg variance, and the cvs curve is correct at 420°f (per wire data sheet) then your displayed mod temp will be lower than actual coil temp.
Per your comment about the DNA being accurate you are assuming that the tfr value of the wire and the csv file on your mod are a good match. I'm not saying that they aren't a good match but you may find that by eliminating the SE csv and instead using a straight TCR value extracted from a dry cotton browning test you may discover that DNAs are more accurate than "Barely within tolerance". At the same time you would be proving the Evolv is not deliberately skewing their TC temp algorithms to enhance vapor production or "protect" users as some other mod manufacturers have been accused of.
 
Last edited:
Let me rephrase "The DNA was accurate at 400F, which was the setting I used throughout these tests".

The goal of this post was to show what temps real life modern attys are seeing, under different conditions. (The context being the carcinogen discussion) The thermocouple demonstrated that independently of the DNA. My goal wasnt to validate how the DNA controls across its temperature range or prove/disprove any "skewing" theories.

You seem to have faith in the cotton test, I dont simply because I dont use cotton, nor have I researched this test.
I trust my thermocouples implicitly.
 
OK, so I looked up the cotton scorch test and I honestly dont think that proves anything more than what I proved with the thermocouple above. Both tests only validated one specific temperature. The cotton scorch test only validates that a mod is accurate at 420, nothing more.

So, I did a different test. Using the thermocouple I measured at a variety of temperature settings. Here are the results. Each reading was repeated twice. I have screen captures of all 5 datapoints if anyone desires validation.
  • DNA set at 300, Thermocouple measured 307
  • DNA set at 350, Thermocouple measured 349
  • DNA set at 400, Thermocouple measured 393
  • DNA set at 450, Thermocouple measured 442
  • DNA set at 500, Thermocouple measured 485
  • DNA set at 550, Thermocouple insulation melted before reading could be obtained
For the most part, actual temps were a tick on the low side. That could be the DNA, the TCR, the wire, etc. With exception of the 500 degree measurement they were all within Evolv's stated accuracy of +/- 10 degrees.

IMHO, this is better than a cotton scorch test.
 
Thanks for taking the time and effort to do these tests. It's interesting stuff.

The center of wick measurement being lower than the coil temperature makes perfect sense, as the temperature of a saturated wick will be limited by the boiling point of the liquid. When it comes to carcinogen production I assume that the hottest spot of the wire is the most interesting one. Even if it doesn't contact the liquid directly, it will contact the vapor.
 
Great testing Mike! And anyone counting on a cotton scorching test to validate 420 deg F is dreaming lol. Any oils or residues, moisture content etc. affects the value it singes at and I wouldn't be surprised if the variety of cotton does as well.
 
Last edited:
Wow Mike, that's amazing! You are really making me want to have the ability to build my own coils and use TC-- I can only vape VG, and have tended to use darker flavors, I just like them better, but the GUNK is incredible, rather fast. I also use MTL and only at 13.5 watts, but I love the real world testing you've done and I will definitely be starting to learn about what I *can* do, I want to make vaping as safe as possible since I was already headed toward COPD (not technically diagnosed, but I got REALLY BAD pneumonia x3 in the past year and a half... leading me back to vaping.)

In the meantime, I will definitely be paying more attention to my vaping habits, coil replacement, and trying some new flavors, like, yesterday. Thank you so much!

Anna
 

Blog entry information

Author
mikepetro
Views
3,286
Comments
20
Last update

More entries in ECF Blogs

More entries from mikepetro