OFFICIAL AvidVaper.com HH.357 discussion thread
- Thread starter Cisco
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Cisco, in another post somebody mentioned the innards of the bottom-feeder beta version being a Joye 306. As I'm only familiar w/ Cisco spec being Cisco, I was wondering if this is a different 306 in the bottom-feeder vs the standard HH or if it's a naming/predecessor issue I'm unfamiliar with? -Magnus
357 Review
Throat Hit = Good
Taste = Good (306/510 better but I do not like that atty)
Vapor Production = Good (Cisco 306 from Advid is better but is too airy not air tight)
Draw = Great (Best draw of any atty I tried)
My atty leaks. (Every atty I have had has leaked though.........this one should not I am told)
I highly reccomend this atty.
Throat Hit = Good
Taste = Good (306/510 better but I do not like that atty)
Vapor Production = Good (Cisco 306 from Advid is better but is too airy not air tight)
Draw = Great (Best draw of any atty I tried)
My atty leaks. (Every atty I have had has leaked though.........this one should not I am told)
I highly reccomend this atty.
Last edited:
I do not understand why I can not find reviews on this atty................weird.
lurking... curious if used with an amp protected VV pv... (Pro vari in my case)...
i have no trouble with the 2.0 LR Hybrid as far as amps are concerned, but don't care too much for the atty as the vapor production is not so great imo.
i have no trouble with the 2.0 LR Hybrid as far as amps are concerned, but don't care too much for the atty as the vapor production is not so great imo.
Are you hard headed? Just kidding.....I understand your concern.
The 357 works on the Pro Vari from 3.3 to-4.2 Volts.
E2 at 4.3..................
How long have you been using this atty? Mt vapor production has picked up after a couple of days. Let me know.
BTW I am ruining all my shirts with leaking atties.
Could very well be, Cisco Spec atomizers were not officially a part of any beta versions. Hanna was making the original 357's from parts that people would send him, so they could have been from a Joye.
You shouldn't call the 357's bottom feeder versions, I would refer to them as open center post as opposed to sealed center post. Open center post atomizers are for bottom feeders and non bottom feeders. The bottom feeder versions available at another vendor are designed for bottom feeders only and will probably leak on anything else. The new run we have coming next week will have an open center post and will work on anything including bottom feeders.
Hope this clears up any confusion.
Cisco
For further clarification, I'm the poster that mentioned Hanna modded some attys for me using some Joye 1.5 Ω 306 attys I sent him.
You summed it up nicely, Cisco. They have open center posts. And they work very well!
to the leakers:
broken inner seal=
leaking
loss of flavor
loss of vapor
pretty much everything about this atty revolves around the seal, and dirrected airflow. This atty should not leak unless really flooded. Your battery may have pushed the positive post high enough to break the seal.
broken inner seal=
leaking
loss of flavor
loss of vapor
pretty much everything about this atty revolves around the seal, and dirrected airflow. This atty should not leak unless really flooded. Your battery may have pushed the positive post high enough to break the seal.
Thank you for the clarification. So the production versions do use Cisco 306s in this case, excellent.
Open center post version. I'll work on remembering that, thanks, -Magnus
How do u know this? I think I have a broken seal. Thanks. What do I do now?
sorry should have introduced myself...this is Hanna. I make the 357.
shoot me another e-mail cam.
shoot me another e-mail cam.
I'm sorry Hanna but is the seal issue something you can share w/ the rest of us for future reference? Or is it something proprietary you don't want to share publicly?
Cisco, does the exchange policy cover if these ohm out too low and trigger errors on our Vvs? Or is there a voltage range already specified for use to keep it "in warranty" status? -Magnus
Cisco, does the exchange policy cover if these ohm out too low and trigger errors on our Vvs? Or is there a voltage range already specified for use to keep it "in warranty" status? -Magnus
the detailed workings of the seal is proprietary. The potential for this issue has been eliminated completely for future attys.
when the seal is working and atty is full, when you draw from it with no power you should get a CRACKING type gurgle. This is the seal working and pulling fluid and air through the correct channel. you can kind of feel it when you hold the atty and do this.
when the seal is working and atty is full, when you draw from it with no power you should get a CRACKING type gurgle. This is the seal working and pulling fluid and air through the correct channel. you can kind of feel it when you hold the atty and do this.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
