My wife says that constant vaping is worse than cigarettes, she noticed that I was vaping a lot and keeping the smoke in my lungs for too long. She went online and read about vaping on a W.H.O. world health organization site that explains that vaping is possibly worse than smoking, and that they are looking into banning vaping!!!! So, can anyone help enlighten me and my wife?? (My wife still smokes by the Way!!)
How does that work? Cigarette smoke has been found to contain thousands of chemicals, over 50 of which are known to cause cancer, while vaping has nicotine and flavoring. And the base liquids are used is thousands of consumer products. Many of which are in your house right now. Also, they're used in medications.
Ooo, here's something about the chemicals in cigs:
[url=http://www.tricountycessation.org/tobaccofacts/Cigarette-Ingredients.html]Cigarette Ingredients - Chemicals in Cigarettes[/URL]
What Chemicals Are In Tobacco Smoke? What Is Cigarette Smoke?
"Experts say that cigarette smoke contains over 4,000 different compounds. A significant number of them are toxic (poisonous) and can damage our cells. Many of them are carcinogenic..."
Some of my personal favorites:
Benzene - used in gasoline
Formaldehyde
Hydrogen Cyanide - some states use this chemical in their gas chambers for executions
(Yeah, cyanide, actual poison used in "gas chambers"... she's inhaling it)
Lead
Carbon Monoxide - this is a poisonous gas.
Methane (sewer gas)
Arsenic (well, poison)
Ammonia! (so... window cleaner?)
Butane (lighter fluid)
But get this:
Nicotine - this is not carcinogenic...
Huh. So the one thing vaping has in common with smoking is nicotine which is
not carcinogenic. Interesting.
What about the base liquids? Well, PG (propylene glycol):
Propylene glycol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The acute oral toxicity of propylene glycol is very low, and large quantities are required to cause perceptible health damage in humans..."
"It would be nearly impossible to reach toxic levels by consuming foods or supplements, which contain at most 1 g/kg of PG."
Wait, wait... food and supplements? They put it in our food? So we were getting PG already?
"Propylene glycol does not cause sensitization and it shows no evidence of being a carcinogen or of being genotoxic."
"Similarly, propylene glycol is an approved food additive for human food as well..."
I'll be damned. We eat the stuff already. Huh.
What about VG (vegetable glycerine)?
Glycerol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In foods and beverages, glycerol serves as a humectant, solvent, and sweetener, and may help preserve foods. It is also used as filler in commercially prepared low-fat foods (e.g., cookies), and as a thickening agent in liqueurs. Glycerol and water are used to preserve certain types of leaves.[6] As a sugar substitute, it has approximately 27 kilocalories per teaspoon (sugar has 20) and is 60% as sweet as sucrose. It does not feed the bacteria that form plaques and cause dental cavities. As a food additive, glycerol is labeled as E number E422. It is added to icing (frosting) to prevent it setting too hard.
As used in foods, glycerol is categorized by the American Dietetic Association as a carbohydrate. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) carbohydrate designation includes all caloric macronutrients excluding protein and fat. Glycerol has a caloric density similar to table sugar, but a lower glycemic index and different metabolic pathway within the body, so some dietary advocates accept glycerol as a sweetener compatible with low carbohydrate diets."
Um... so it's in food all over the place is it?
And there's:
"Glycerol is used in medical and pharmaceutical and personal care preparations, mainly as a means of improving smoothness, providing lubrication and as a humectant. It is found in allergen immunotherapies, cough syrups, elixirs and expectorants, toothpaste, mouthwashes, skin care products, shaving cream, hair care products, soaps and water-based personal lubricants. In solid dosage forms like tablets, glycerol is used as a tablet holding agent. For human consumption, glycerol is classified by the U.S. FDA among the sugar alcohols as a caloric macronutrient."
Huh. Almost as if it's safe for humans or something.
Exactly how is it "worse" than inhaling cyanide, methane, butane, ammonia... I mean, come on. Really?
I'd like to actually see these sites that claim this...