Peering through the mist..

[somdcomputerguy]

This is very interesting (to me anyway). I have quoted a bit from the paper below. I think whoever wrote the paper must've been a very fast typer, because I had to read it slowly and more than once before it began to sink into my thick head.

..there is no evidence that vaping produces inhalable exposures to contaminants of the aerosol that would warrant health concerns by the standards that are used to ensure safety of workplaces.

Here is a link to the paper (PDF) itself.
http://publichealth.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/publichealth/ms08.ashx

 

[rolygate]

Prof Burstyn used nearly 10,000 measurements to reach his conclusions on the toxicology of vaping. It is regarded as the standard work on the subject.

Following this is the Cochrane Review, which also came to the same conclusion: there are no significant issues, at least for regular vapers.

 

[Cullin Kin]

Wow! What an awesome article. It's nice to see an IEEE formatted article with little bias on vaping coming to this conclusion. I'm actually writing a research paper on vaping for a class and will likely use this article as a reference. Thank you!

 

[VapieDan]

Never let facts get in the way of campaign contributions, taxes, testing and registration fees, grants for studies, or just bribery in general.