Just a Hypothetical.
If including some form of CRP on e-Liquids swayed more Non-Vaper's to having a Favorable View of e-Cigarettes, is CRP all that Bad?
BTW - One can Ask a Similar Question by replacing the word "Non-Vapor's" with the word "Senators" in the above sentence.
Your being very idealistic. Fact is, the masses will always look down on vaping because vaping is smoking. Instead of inhaling burned tobacco smoke, you are smoking PG/VG vapor. Smoking is a demon so vaping must be a demon because it looks the same and it involves nicotine delivery.
So seeing how vaping is doomed from the start, I wanna start seeing childproof caps on alcohol and household cleaners.
I want these big bad chemical and liquor companies to start spending money on things vaping companies are supposed to spend money on. If governments think that parents are not to be held responsible when it comes to eliquid, then I don't see any reason why those same parents WOULD all of a sudden be held responsible if their child drinks liquor or a household cleaner.
If our governments and corporations are to raise our children for us, let's go full force on this. I don't want to see SC Johnson and similar companies get a free pass here. The chemicals they sell are as toxic as eliquid and therefore need to have childproof caps. They have gotten a free ride WAY too long now.