So my first print of my larger version of my angled box arrived from Shapeways today (a week early...hats off to Shapeways on that front). In comparison to the print from Sculpteo for my smaller version, the Shapeways is a lighter blue (more toy like...my wife says indigo) and is noticeably less polished and more rough feeling. Fitment of the door requires sanding the bottom (it's about .5mm too tall) and alignment is slightly off to one side (this is a printing, not design issue). I have the door and body printed as a unit to minimize any such discrepancy, but apparently Shapeway's printers can't get the sizing perfectly correct even in the same print. Wall thickness is not what it should be...there appears to have been some print loss of about .2-.25mm but it's not so far off as to cause any issues. The interior battery rails should be interwoven with the interior walls but are not...this was my issue and I'm correcting in my design now. Interior board mount posts and screen cutout are fine and the 510 recess hole is spot on. Overall, the Shapeways print is really less accurate, but seems workable. I'm going to make a few minor design changes to my version that has been uploaded elsewhere, but overall the design seems sound....with a few minor corrections. I'm just even more convinced that Sculpteo is far superior in its print capability. I hope that i.materialize comes through with quality similar to that of Sculpteo, but for now I'll only print my own builds with Sculpteo.
EDIT: I've upload my minor design changes to where they've been previously posted.
EDIT: I've upload my minor design changes to where they've been previously posted.
Last edited: