O.K., let's do it step by step....
Firstly, if you see the 'new coil/same coil" (a.k.a. NCSC....from now on....
) message and you positively know that it's the same coil...why do you answer as 'NewCoil'? Because you've seen an apparent change in resistance? If so, that's a poor interface design as it forces some of you to the wrong choice, but knowing now that the actual base resistance is unchanged (if it is, like my
device does), now you're in best position to pick up the right answer.....
Secondly, about some setups....currently I'm with a Magma in single coil, Ni-200 0,40 mm, and it's locked at 0,17 ohm. I've put 210 ºC as target temperature, a bit lower than I usually choose, and that 0,17 ohm resistance goes up to 0,34 ohm.....
Remember, that's a ratio of resistances, R/R0=2,000, which is found under TCR=0,00575 at 190-195ºC. but the actual TCR for Ni-200 in this mod is about 0,0055, so under that one, it's really about 200-205ºC, which I sanction as close enough.
If I do the same in a
ipv D2 (I've got one too, for that matter), and I maintain the 210 ºC target, it goes up, nearly burning my vape. Why? because my IPV D2 seems to use a TCR of about 0,0065 or more, so it expects a ratio of 2,2 or more....and as the actual Ni-200 has not so high TCR, the actual temperature is about 255 ºC...... check the tables (or do the math with the equations) and you'll see that.
Now your issue. You firstly set the base resistance as 0,15 ohm at, supposedly, 20ºC. You try it at a unknown temperature setting (whatever) and you find it unsatisfactory or anaemic...... then you re-set the base resistance, but now your atomizer IS NOT a 20 ºc, it is hotter, and without changing your temperature setting, now it apparently works better.
It's not an issue of random variances on base resistances, TCR's or software driftings. It's you, changing the calibration at a wrong temperature. As a matter of fact, if you commit some error in the actual temperature of calibration, let's say 'deltaT' (being it higher than the expected 20 ºC), your actual maximum temperature and the one set up on the screen will differ one another in 'deltaT'....Why? Because of the linear nature of the approximation that the chip uses.
So, if you re-calibrate at 60 ºC instead of the expected 20 ºC, you target temperature will be effectively 40ºC hotter...and naturally that causes a warmer vape. Try to calibrate it properly and then set the target 40 ºC hotter instead.....it should work the same, and it appears to me more logically consistent, doesn't it?
Sorry for the long and numerically linked answer, but it was as important the why as the short answer should be. And the short answer to
'So does this means when i perform warmup/off then on /an choosing "new coil" would actually reset/recalibrate the base resistance?' is YES. You're re-calibrating (wrongly re-calibrating) the device.
But if, coupled with this, there are other issues, whereas numerical, precision, stability of calibrations, user-induced because unexplained behaviours, or what else close encounters on the third phase you might find there, well, it's all up to discover what's really happening........