RDA Round-Table Discussion and Lookout
- Thread starter Mr.Mann
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
How does it compare to the vector? I absolutely love my aeolus and never saw the point of getting a vector because I had an aeolus v1 right around the time it came out.Just put this 22g build on my new Aeolus v2. Pretty similar to the Vector.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Hahahahaha I literally came here to post this also. F-ing carseat ate mine over the weekend and I can't find it to save my life. Jeez and I thought that the spitback was noticeable before... [HASHTAG]#teamnodriptip[/HASHTAG] is rough on the Stumpy
Very similar. More airy fully open which is hard to believe. Vapor and flavor very similar. Build deck similar, plenty of room. It's redundant to the Vector for the most part plus use your own tip is nice.
The Velocity is back in stock at Avid Vaper, ordered one this afternoon.
Anyone find a Mikro stateside? Similar build deck the the AX1, but topair and a smaller chamber.
I've been looking at the Stumpy. It's so similar to the Derringer which I like. But the Derringer can get a little weepy if ya know what I mean. One drop too many and I'm reaching for the tissue. Is the Stumpy better in that regard? Deeper well ? And what else if anything makes it better then Derringer? Thanks.
The Stumpy is less messy than the Derringer (even though I don't have a huge problem with the Derringer in that regard). Other than that, the performance is almost identical IMO. You'll probably get several comments that the Stumpy blows the Derringer away and everyone is entitled to his/her opinion even if I don't understand it. They're essentially the same atty other than the Stumpy has only two posts to the Derringer's three and different aesthetics. If less mess is important to you then the Stumpy may be worth it. If you're looking for a markedly better/different vape experience, IMO, look elsewhere.
Thank you jh. I appreciate the honesty and quick response.
The airholes on the stumpy being a bit higher makes it much less prone to leakage
The two Post design makes it much better to build for me
The mini chuff DT or the 510 DT adapter makes it better to drip for me
I love my stumpy and didn't care much for my derringer
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Just to expand a bit on Vapero's post. Just a few objective differences:
- The top cap is slightly conical and (generally speaking) less close to the coils, so given an uber-low ohm build, it will less likely turn into a radiator (not to say it will be a cooler vape though...just depends)
- The well is deeper and is further enhanced by lack of a center post
- More build options
- Larger, slotted posts for thicker ('exotic') coils
- More chamber size to use larger coils
- **In-between-posts builds are possible (various coil-types; vertical or horizontal)
**Just being a two-post design is not inherently special, but the spacing of the Stumpy's posts makes it more functional and beyond something that can be minimized to "just" like any other two-post design. Other two-post decks like a Magma, a Manta or even a Petri do not offer the same space in the center channel as the Stumpy, and because of that spacing you can try many more types of build configurations. The Stumpy, in that regard, would be more akin to the Hobo v3.1 and what it can do.
Last edited:
Al in all, they're both good, but one has more versatility.
That might be a stretch.
Found the Mikro here:
http://vapervenue.com/collections/atomizers/products/adler-industries-mikro-rda
http://vapervenue.com/collections/atomizers/products/adler-industries-mikro-rda
Damn you! I don't have the money right now, well, I do but I shouldn't. I thought that thing was way more than that!!! Here we go. @Verb, are we jumping together? LOL
Thanks, man.
Edit: just saw they got the 454 Big Block v2 for $40!!! And the N22 for $50?!?!?!?!?!
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
