So you cannot cite any specific language. You are relying on the good faith of the current and all future prosecutors and judges to interpret the spirit of the law as you think it is crafted. Good luck to you. It's your rabbit hole and I'm really out of it.
I always use the civil forfeiture laws, which are truly a violation of the Constitutional guarantee of Due Process and Equal Protection, as an example. At the time we were told this was a necessary evil to convict and punish organized crime and dealers in certain unmentionables, that it was not directed at "ordinary citizens". A few years later we were seeing hapless John's having their cars seized under those acts merely for soliciting a prostitute. By that time no one talked about spirit of intent, they just read the law, as it stood, word for word, and interpreted plain English, and sold those cars at auction. You have far, far more faith in the gov't than I do. They may not start arresting DIYers the day the law goes into effect, but years later that is the kind of law that comes back to haunt the citizenry.
