I rarely visit this site; however, it is the optimum spot to collect information from kind people
and Gurus with enough free time to pen 10,364 posts on a subject that is peripheral to me. When I first wrote that I was opposed to the term Vaping it was an extemporaneous thought; I was concerned with procuring a new device. I didnt pay mind to posts that werent correlated to my immediate objective. I have a new device; thank you all for sharing your knowledge and advice.
I jumped back on here to record names of e-liquid recommendations and I read the posts regarding my disdain for the term Vaping. Now I have to revisit this subject because an omnipotent veteran castigated me for my opinion and I was unawares.
WV2WIN: I apologize for my delayed reply to following the statement/question you posed in a tyrannizing manner:
Since you are using a device that "vaporizes" a liquid and does not burn a solid or create smoke but instead creates a "vapor", then what more appropriate term would you suggest, BASED on the logic of the devices' functionality??
Foreword: I chose to use e-cigarettes instead of traditional cigarettes for personal reasons. I do not labor under the misconception that what I am ingesting now is better than traditional cigarettes (although I feel better and smell better.) I am placing my life in the hands of faceless people that own a laptop.
The term Vaping is innocuous nomenclature; the etymology of Vaping suggests it is natural, safe, breezy and benign. THAT IS NOT TRUE. Therefore it is irresponsible to use a term that suggests the device merely Vaporizes. WV2WIN you forgot to address the very important matter of What it is vaporizing? I dont want the 15 year old I love thinking it is safe because it is a liquid named Vanilla Cupcake and smells sweet. This is not a product that has been approved by the FDA; we are not certain what the ingredients are regardless of what the websites report. MyFreedomSmokes.com displayed pictures of Joytech batteries on their site and they billed me for an ego-C Joytech battery. Then a replica arrived in the mail that did not have the Joytech insignia and it broke two weeks later. They made money off me by lying about something I was certain to discover, I can only imagine how they manipulate the merchandise we cant/won't see.
I dont have a Doctorate in chemistry (and I would bet my left arm WV2WIN does not either) therefore we cannot deduce the compounds of e-juices being sold by the thousands of vendors who jumped on the bandwagon to make money. Any of these vendors could report their juice is made of Angel farts and Puppy Breath and we have to believe them because they dont answer to anybody (in most States), the government hasnt figured out how to regulate them yet. We are essentially taking the same gamble as any chemically dependent person does, except we buy our fix on pretty websites infused with endearing marketing techniques like sample bottles that win our allegiance and keep us hooked. Cigarettes are insidious, destructive chemicals, but the ingredients have been made public.
Second, I feel the English language has been disgraced enough during my lifetime and been reduced by the simple logic you suggested. You may be able to thread every model/tank/cart/dont/care/ blindfolded, but I have the capacity to conceptualize and convey alternative verbs and thread them into a sentence. I can refer to enjoying an e-cigarette by manipulating my vocabulary based on what I deem appropriate when considering my environment, the age group, my company, etc. For over a year I have never employed the word Vaping and I have not misled people when referencing my affinity for e-cigarettes nor have I had to be verbose or play charades.
I like e-cigarettes.
I dont like the term Vaping.