FDA Another lawsuit filed! E-Vaping Coalition of America
- Thread starter sonicdsl
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Interesting development on the lawsuits...
(In case you have Twitter blocked, it says that the DC Circuit Judge has issued an order to consolidate the Nicopure and Right to be Smoke-Free cases).
(In case you have Twitter blocked, it says that the DC Circuit Judge has issued an order to consolidate the Nicopure and Right to be Smoke-Free cases).
And @KODIAK (TM)
Got a reply from Azim today. Thanked me... Basically ...funds received by the Right to be Smoke Free Coalition are being directed toward the FDA lawsuit. Click on "Fight the FDA Deeming Regulations" box. While that coalition has other issues with Indiana specifically, that's a separate deal. Azim also suggests anything 4 figures should be done by check rather than paypal, where they'd have to use some to pay paypal.... but just a suggestion.
Ended up having to go through paypal because for some reason, using the cc that paypal uses was not accepted by the site??
Anyway, 'donated' to the cause!! :- )
Responses are 'mixed'. Real basically - Pros are it can speed up a trial, coordination and less expense. Cons - a strong case can be drawn down by a weaker case, but there can be separate judgments as well.
Looks like Both parties are asking for an Extension on whether or not they have an objection to Consolidating these lawsuits.
"Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's June 21, 2016, Minute Order by SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, ROBERT CALIFF, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION(Beckenhauer, Eric)"
NICOPURE LABS, LLC v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al (1:16-cv-00878), District Of Columbia District Court
"Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Court's June 21, 2016, Minute Order by SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, ROBERT CALIFF, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION(Beckenhauer, Eric)"
NICOPURE LABS, LLC v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al (1:16-cv-00878), District Of Columbia District Court
Last edited:
Seminar July 14th from a tweet from Azim Chowdhury:
E-cigarette Deeming Regulations: Don’t get left behind
Perrin Conferences - E-CIGARETTE DEEMING REGULATIONS: DON’T GET LEFT BEHIND
Hopefully it will be online audio....
E-cigarette Deeming Regulations: Don’t get left behind
Perrin Conferences - E-CIGARETTE DEEMING REGULATIONS: DON’T GET LEFT BEHIND
Hopefully it will be online audio....
Last edited by a moderator:
Did you paste in the wrong description? Link seems correct...
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, interesting. Not sure how this plays out. I see pros and cons. Hate to put all the eggs into one basket
furthermore...
If Judge Jackson will by trying this case it should be noted she's an Obama appointee.
Last edited:
Yes, interesting. Not sure how this plays out. I see pros and cons. Hate to put all the eggs into one basket
furthermore...
If Judge Jackson will by trying this case it should be noted she's an Obama appointee.
Which Jackson? There are I think 4 of them. LOL.
List of federal judges appointed by Barack Obama - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If Judge Jackson will by trying this case it should be noted she's an Obama appointee.
She's also the judge that told the Administration to go pound sand when they tried to use executive privilege regarding Fast and Furious. She may be an Obama appointee, but she doesn't roll over and play dead whenever the administration tries to force the issue.
Not sure what you mean by 'wrong description'. The title is what is at the link. Azim's tweet isn't linked but that's where I got the seminar link.
In the video on 1st page, Azim mentions that the 2 cases could be merged. I gathered its a positive thing. He said they both could support the case financaly. He also talked about how having a lot of business involed in the case makes a bigger impression on the judge as it shows the full industry being effected by the regs, I/e the more stakeholders the better.
They can also divide and conquer regarding asset allocation. More to choose from regarding who has the best legal minds & resources to put forward any given argument(s). As both law suits were presenting several similar points in their complaints, only the very best people chosen between the two firms need to go forward on specific points.
The link goes to, "https://www(dot)perrinconferences.com/html/Upcoming_Events/e-cigarette_deeming_regulations.shtml" but the text description I see is "Perrin Conferences - Flint Water Crisis: Get in the Know about Lead Poisoning and How It’s Litigated Webinar" Had to switch to a text only view to even copy it...
Sorry, it just seemed confusing to me. Others who do not know how to 'hover' links might not even bother to read since it looks off topic.
The problem was in the title the web developer assigned to the page. When you post a link here, by default, it grabs the title on the webpage for text. I went back up and edited the links at the code level in the previous posts to reduce any confusion.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
