Any counter arguments?

[adesara]

E-Cigs Have A Million Times More Cancer-Causing Chemicals Than Polluted Air – Hong Kong Study

 

[Izan]

Nothing BUT: Medical Research

 

[Vaslovik]

We all know better, and there is little point in arguing so obvious a lie. Moreover any "study" these days is quite simply propaganda put out in service to someone's agenda. It shouldn't be too difficult to figure out who's in this case.

 

[sonicbomb]

A million is a nice round number

 

[B2L]

My counter argument would be "oh yeah, well your ugly and your mama dresses you funny"

Why? It's equally as scientific as the "study"

 

[sofarsogood]

Everybody knows scientists and public health officials would never tell outrageous flat out lies. So everybody has to stop vaping and go back to smoking. A million times is a lot so smoking must be at least 95% lower risk than vaping, right?

 

[adesara]

Vested interests at it again I guess.

 

[Jim_ MDP]

Not entirely.
The researcher (biased, true) mismatched his units. Mls of liquid vs CCs of air.
The Hubble screw-up comes to mind.

Dr F had an immediate, and scathing, rebuttal.