I have no idea if you're agreeing or disagreeing or what.Consider it a comment about 'can't we all just get along'.
I have no idea if you're agreeing or disagreeing or what.Consider it a comment about 'can't we all just get along'.
The bill classifies vapor products as tobacco products thereby inherently prohibits any online retail or direct online B2C sales of any "vapor product, alternative nicotine product or e-liquid product" to occur within the Arkansas state line.
I hope someone challenges it but I feel it's going to take everyone nationwide coming together and funding it.
Commerce Clause Limitations on State Regulation
The Commerce Clause is a grant of power to Congress, not an express limitation on the power of the states to regulate the economy. At least four possible interpretations of the Commerce Clause have been proposed. First, it has been suggested that the Clause gives Congress the exclusive power to regulate commerce. Under this interpretation, states are divested of all power to regulate interstate commerce. Second, it has been suggested that the Clause gives Congress and the states concurrent power to regulate commerce. Under this view, state regulation of commerce is invalid only when it is preempted by federal law. Third, it has been suggested that the Clause assumes that Congress and the states each have their own mutually exclusive zones of regulatory power. Under this interpretation, it becomes the job of the courts to determine whether one sovereign has invaded the exclusive regulatory zone of the other. Finally, it has been suggested that the Clause by its own force divests states of the power to regulate commerce in certain ways, but the states and Congress retain concurrent power to regulate commerce in many other ways. This fourth interpretation, a complicated hybrid of two others, turns out to be the approach taken by the Court in its decisions interpreting the Commerce Clause.
That said, I think the Commerce Clause is inapplicable here, not sure on the legal reasoning but quite a number of states have banned online alcohol sales. I'd think that the Commerce Clause would have been used long ago to open up the online alcohol market more widely if it were applicable to tobacco in this manner.
It was. Swedenburg v. Kelly. Only some states have found workarounds that also should be challenged, but the Institute for Justice (think a libertarian version of ACLU - except it protects/fights for all rights *, not just speech) won in the Supreme Court the case regarding wine shipping from some states to others.
In this case you are right. All parties in or out of state have to play by the same rules.That said, I think the Commerce Clause is inapplicable here, not sure on the legal reasoning but quite a number of states have banned online alcohol sales.
I asked the attorney at the Arkansas ATC, who is refreshingly responsive, courteous and helpful compared to many public servants I have dealt with over the years, some follow up questions about e-juice. Here is an excerpt (his complete reply is below):
"It is unlawful for any vendor, in state or out of state, to make an online sales of e-liquids (with or without nicotine content), pre-filled e-cigarettes, e-cigars and the like, and vapor devices containing a vapor generating substance end consumers in Arkansas.".
The emphasis in this quote is not mine. It is the attorney's. How in the world Arkansas legislators can equate e-liquid that contains no nicotine at all with tobacco and regulate it as such is simply ludicrous. Of course this is just one of many problems with this new law in Arkansas. This law makes ignorant and erroneous equivocations, infringes on inter-state commerce, restricts consumer choices, does nothing to advance public safety, etc.. I, and hopefully many others, will continue to lobby Arkansas legislators to repeal or substantially revise the onerous and ill-advised law. In the meantime I will have to make other arrangements to obtain my favorite e-juices that are not stocked in local vape shops. It also appears that the impact on Arkansas vape shops will be significant as well. At the very least it looks like they will have to obtain a retail sales permit to sell e-juice at all and get a manufacturer's license (I have no idea what requirements for this are) if they want to mix up their own e-juice.
View attachment 494615
I had a problem on the Provape website. I was able to resolve the issue by contacting them directly. They have removed AR as a valid shipping state on their site as a stopgap meaure but will work directly with individuals to accomodate legit orders.Thank you so much for this. I will send it immediately to the website that refused my order...so maybe I won't have to say I'm from Arizona, again >.> *coughcough*
I recently tried to order some coils for my Subox mini from Mad____s and was told....
Unfortunately, we are unable to send anything to our customers in Texas, Arkansas, North Dakota, Utah, and Indiana due to new laws and regulations set by the states. We apologize for any inconvenience that this may cause. We ask that you have patience with us and our legal team. We will send out a newsletter out as soon as we know when we will be able to send packages out to your state again. If you are not signed up for the newsletter we ask that you sign up on the bottom of the home page. Thank you.
Ticket status has been changed to Waiting for customer
With best regards,
Katie L
I also never saw a "call to action" for Arkansas, though I have participated in a few other states fight against banning/regulation. I am now 2 years smoke free and resent the government interference here. I see no reason for the over reaction to E-Cigs when more accidents are caused by cosmetics! I understand vendors must now acquire a permit to sell certain vaping products here in Arkansas, in addition to the other States mentioned. Hope it doesn't keep spreading. That seems like money is the driving force rather than concern for public health.
I also tentatively started an order for nictotime base from another website, to see if I'd be a able...I may need to pull the trigger on that soon in case my state's laws remain stringent, and before the site stops selling.