The top one is awesome!
Like with three !!! awesome!
Like with three !!! awesome!
I like both but was wondering if the top might look better with a different background color?
Are you talking about Red Tail or Aroma? Jerry isn't interested in changing Red Tail's logo.The top one is awesome!
Like with three !!! awesome!
Are you talking about Red Tail or Aroma? Jerry isn't interested in changing Red Tail's logo.
...at least not right away.
Here's what I'm hoping will be "THE" official Aroma signature. We'll see.
I'm still looking for ideas on how to improve the logos. I want to know. If you think they look like crap, I want to know that, too.
Top.
I feel like I'm at the optometrist.
Hmmmm, at first I thought that the word "differently" in the 1st one diverted my attention away from the main statement, so I thought I liked the second one better. Then I wondered if the gold writing in the 2nd one was too light and would make people struggle to read it (but this depends upon what size this logo would be). Yet, that could be very engaging too. Now, I just don't know. Hmmmm...(how's that for clarity)? Perhaps I'm not going to be as helpful as I had hoped :-(Okay which of these two do you guys like the best?
Okay which of these two do you guys like the best?
Hmmmm, at first I thought that the word "differently" in the 1st one diverted my attention away from the main statement, so I thought I liked the second one better. Then I wondered if the gold writing in the 2nd one was too light and would make people struggle to read it (but this depends upon what size this logo would be). Yet, that could be very engaging too. Now, I just don't know. Hmmmm...(how's that for clarity)? Perhaps I'm not going to be as helpful as I had hoped :-(
That was actually very helpful.Bottom one. The top one the background writing seems to pop out more and distracts from the logo. But on the bottom one, is there a fade going on with the bottom background line? It seems lighter than the top one.
Good call. I wasn't thinking about that. It could give the wrong impression. Back to the drawing board.I'm still liking the lighter one - Edit 2. I also liked the verbiage better in the first one, as the "does not satisfy" seems to stand out more and I'm not so keep on seeing that and then the Aroma Ejuice logo.
[plain][URL="http://www.aromaejuice.com/"][IMG]http://i1241.photobucket.com/albums/gg505/PLANofMAN/TheAromaEjuiceSignature4_zps272d3d38.gif[/IMG][/URL][/plain]
There's one in progress, but I haven't been happy with it so far.This is some good stuff I added one to my sig and set it as a link to Aroma's site. Easier one-click access for anyone who may come across the sig's on the forum. Here's the code you can use for this latest one PLAN has added. Just copy and paste this all into your sig editor:
Code:[plain][URL="http://www.aromaejuice.com/"][IMG]http://i1241.photobucket.com/albums/gg505/PLANofMAN/TheAromaEjuiceSignature4_zps272d3d38.gif[/IMG][/URL][/plain]
Any works on the Dark Honey Tobacco one?
Good call. I wasn't thinking about that. It could give the wrong impression. Back to the drawing board.
Edit:
I think they look greatI'm still not 100% happy with it, but here's what I have at the moment.
[plain][URL="http://www.aromaejuice.com/"][IMG]http://i1241.photobucket.com/albums/gg505/PLANofMAN/DarkHoneyTobacco_zps0b229b89.gif[/IMG][/URL][/plain]
[plain][URL="http://www.aromaejuice.com/"][IMG]http://i1241.photobucket.com/albums/gg505/PLANofMAN/DarkHoneyTobacco2_zps2739290d.gif[/IMG][/URL][/plain]