CA Fed Sen Feinestein responds ---Hmmm?
- Thread starter BrotherBob
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Ugh these preachy politicians need to get a damn life & stay out of our bedrooms & our personal lives vaping doesn't hurt anybody. Actually I'd go a step further & say that they should have let people smoke too and let the chips fall where they may, but that's just me. It's about personal freedom. So sick of these elitist know-it-all politicians constantly telling people what they can & can't do we aren't children .... out. And don't get me started on that stooge Michael Bloomberg. It goes for both parties, both a bunch of preach know it all elitists.
She looks like she's just itching to take a swing at me.
She must know I'm a dirty nicotine user.
Perhaps that picture was taken before she had her morning caffeine.
Don't Quote me on this.
But I think this is the Photo she used for her 2009 Christmas Cards that she sent to Republican House and Senators members.
Michael Bloomberg literally nauseates me when he speaks. He & Giuliani turned New York into a lame corporate Disneyworld with a bunch of surburbanites taking it over & taking away it's soul. I miss seedy New York. Lol.
VOTE THE .......Z OUT!!! VOTE AGAINST ALL OF THEM!!!! IT'S PAST TIME TO BURN THEIR PLAYHOUSE DOWN!!!!!
Even in the hypothesis of becoming addicted to nicotine alone, there's still no issue if you don't burn leaves while inhaling it:
Long-term effects of inhaled nicotine
You'd think if nicotine is a highly addictive and highly dangerous drug that some vapers would be in favor of having it removed from our products. You know, cause it only gives our opposition ammunition to go after us and isn't necessary. Saying instead that it can / should be avoided. But why would these vapers be consistent with their rhetoric? I mean, it's not like people vape for the flavors and the nicotine, is it?
Anyway, if you weren't sure about how an ANTZ might respond to your inquiry on vaping, now you do.
Anyway, if you weren't sure about how an ANTZ might respond to your inquiry on vaping, now you do.
They want proof that ecigs are an effective method of smoking cessation/replacement, all they need to do is look at this forum. I would be half of the users here were prior smokers, and look how many of us are no longer smoking cigarettes, and have noticable better health. I for one, have not had smoked in over 5 years due to ecigs. I no longer cough like I did when smoking, and I can run well over 5 miles a day with no issues.
I'm thinking it is way more than half the users here are prior (heavy) smokers. I'm a current dual user and am 100% certain I am no longer addicted to smoking. Would take ANTZ logic to conclude that eCigs have not been proven as an effective smoking reduction/cessation method.
Stick around this part of the forum and you'll understand in no time.
But you won't like what you find out.
Stick around this part of the forum and you'll understand in no time.
But you won't like what you find out.
I kinda have an idea now after I read some posts on this section of the forums..
I have some temper issues, and this is making me kinda angry irl right now haha...
I'm expecting a similar form letter to the OP from Schumer any day now and look forwarding to replying with the above link
To me, this is the crux of where their anti-vaping stance falls flat on its face. While there is little question that vaping in and of itself is habit forming, and, if we are being honest, is going to lead to a generation of never/only dabbled smokers becoming extended term vapers, there is also little question that existing science doesn't support any objective reason that should be an issue enough that it should be regulated out of existence.
Somehow I think if they were to implement a national 1/10th of a cent per milligram of nicotine tax on juice and nic base they would suddenly be singing a different tune.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
