I DIY and have a ton of nic stashed and will fight tooth and nail for current & future vapers' rights.
Sitting on our asses isn't the correct way to cover them.
It's the people who have stashed nic. who are also most likely to be experienced vapers as well as successful quitters. Your help would be appreciated, but there are others as well (obviously).
Some of these folks don't seem to understand what it takes to build a mod out of a flashlight and a tin Altoids box. Or what the FDA is likely to do to the first vendor who starts sellling a "variable voltage flashlight with EGO threads" - wink, wink, nod, nod. (Can you say: "adulterated tobacco product" ?) Some of these vapers think that the gov't will let itself be defeated via childish word games. Not likely.
Equipment also provides us with some interesting ways to ask questions. What are the pubic health issues presented by glass drip tips (Trippy Tips)? Do they have to show that never-smoker/never-vapers will be less likely to smoke or vape as a result? Or to quit? Since Mitch Zeller mentions exploding batteries, what the public health issues associated with an Ego spinner? Do they have to do studies on how much nicotine the user of an ego spinner is likely to absorb? Is a 900 mAh ego a different "tobacco product component" from an 1100? Do they need to have studies concerning the appeal of brightly-colored egos to minors? Separate studies for each combination of color and battery life? And on, and on and on ...
At the very least, answers to these queries (or the lack thereof) may be fodder for any future litigation, if/when the FDA siezes a shipment of batteries or drip tips, on the grounds that they're "adulterated or misbranded [components of] tobacco products."
Last edited: