Cerabis Ceramic Subohm tank by ceravape

[fisher]

I have a new genuine Cerabis Stainless tank and it worked for about 3 tanks and then started dumping juice when the reservoir was about half empty. The coils are the new ones with the double O rings at the bottom. Tried the .5 coil, .8 coil and replacement coils and they all have the same leaking problem and I mean they dump juice. The problem is progressive and has basically made the tank unusable.

Sorry folks, I am a very experience vaper and this one has been a major disappointment from the performance aspect and the taste.

Even my old tanks like my Sub Ohm G tanks perform much better and taste better with their cotton wicks.

Great idea, but their is a major problem with the engineering, quality control or both.

Back to the drawing board for me.

 

[Bhoot]

44. WTF is it with small tanks. I need ML capacity as well. 4-5 ML minimum. Threw the first tank in the bin. Will wait and see if there is a bigger version of this tank of not. I am not interested in refilling 5-6 times a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Daddy]

44. ... is it with small tanks. I need ML capacity as well. 4-5 ML minimum. Threw the first tank in the bin. Will wait and see if there is a bigger version of this tank of not. I am not interested in refilling 5-6 times a day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hell I refill my BFT 30mm 8ml 4 or 5 times a day.

I don't believe there is a larger version coming. The 44 is named because it is 44mm tall - not sure if measured opened or closed. The same reason for the name applies to the 45. The 45 has some sort of side fill port on it that the 44 does not. The 44 is top fill similar to the original cerabis. I think capacity is ~3 or 4ml.

I think some tanks are in the US right now and there may be reviewers receiving them soon. I'm excited to see some reviews for them.

 

[Bhoot]

Hell I refill my BFT 30mm 8ml 4 or 5 times a day.

I don't believe there is a larger version coming. The 44 is named because it is 44mm tall - not sure if measured opened or closed. The same reason for the name applies to the 45. The 45 has some sort of side fill port on it that the 44 does not. The 44 is top fill similar to the original cerabis. I think capacity is ~3 or 4ml.

I think some tanks are in the US right now and there may be reviewers receiving them soon. I'm excited to see some reviews for them.

Tank is suppose to be 2ml from the stuff I've read.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Daddy]

Tank is suppose to be 2ml from the stuff I've read.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Perhaps to fit the EU regulations. Pretty sure I wouldn't trust any manufacture for being truthful on their marketing of capacity though. Will have to wait and get one in hand and measure it. We could be entering an era where manufactures state a smaller capacity then reality due to regulations, the exact opposite of the past where manufactures exaggerated their capacity to impress customers.

 

[cooladdict]

Tank is suppose to be 2ml from the stuff I've read.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's what I was told, too. It's a 2 ml tank.

 

[cooladdict]

Hell I refill my BFT 30mm 8ml 4 or 5 times a day.

I don't believe there is a larger version coming. The 44 is named because it is 44mm tall - not sure if measured opened or closed. The same reason for the name applies to the 45. The 45 has some sort of side fill port on it that the 44 does not. The 44 is top fill similar to the original cerabis. I think capacity is ~3 or 4ml.

I think some tanks are in the US right now and there may be reviewers receiving them soon. I'm excited to see some reviews for them.

I like that this tank can be purchased as a kit with a mod! I would like to see how the 2 work together. 2 ml is super small capacity, but if the coil works well I am definitely picking one up.

 

[Bhoot]

The video seems to suggest: we banjaxed the first one. Here is another one and hey no leaking. New feature! This is good but very weary also like the aspire clieto, don't mind paying a bit extra for a bigger bore tank. Most important thing is that tank must actually be useable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Formaldehyde]

Kind of off topic but has anyone tried this thing? has a ceramic heating element option, or you can do a single coil. It is called the Hanker RDA by blitz

 

[Daddy]

Kind of off topic but has anyone tried this thing? has a ceramic heating element option, or you can do a single coil. It is called the Hanker RDA by blitz

Have not tried it, but it looks interesting.

 

[Daddy]

The video seems to suggest: we banjaxed the first one.

Not sure how you got that from the video, but you've already stated earlier in this thread you saw the manufacture as admitting guilt by acknowledging and working with customers regarding leaking. I found that hard to believe as well.

 

[Bhoot]

When you a video showing how leak proof a tank is. They also know that having a decent tank will mean more sales. Not a vaping newbie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Daddy]

They put out a video showing how to replace O-rings on the tank and you complain.

They put out a torture test of sorts for a new tank and you complain.

 

[cooladdict]

Kind of off topic but has anyone tried this thing? has a ceramic heating element option, or you can do a single coil. It is called the Hanker RDA by blitz

Interesting! I have been waiting for a ceramic rebuildable. I have seen the 2 that came out earlier this year that have a flat ceramic element but they didn't really pan out I don't think, and they were ridiculously expensive. I might have to grab one of these and give it a whirl!

 

[Troll from behind]

So as it now is this tank worth getting if I would be after a tasty vape with ease if use combined with heads lasting a long time?
I do remember havin some issues with ceramics back in days of 510-atomizers (APEX sumthin), so migh give ceramics another chance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Daddy]

So as it now is this tank worth getting if I would be after a tasty vape with ease if use combined with heads lasting a long time?
I do remember havin some issues with ceramics back in days of 510-atomizers (APEX sumthin), so migh give ceramics another chance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Guess it depends on who you ask. Some of us love it and some hate it. Some complain about leaking while others have experienced no leaking at all. Some like the flavor and some hate it.

I would suggest getting one or trying one out and see if it's for you.

 

[Ahmed Mahfouz]

So as it now is this tank worth getting if I would be after a tasty vape with ease if use combined with heads lasting a long time?
I do remember havin some issues with ceramics back in days of 510-atomizers (APEX sumthin), so migh give ceramics another chance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Personally I think you should skip this one, if it's a case of hit and miss for this tank then why take the risk? In my case leaking like crazy, tried all the solutions and nothing works. And the flavor isn't that good, acceptable but nothing really earth-shattering. I get a lot better flavor from my TFV4 micro and 2 year-old Subtank mini for instance.

 

[bkkdaytrader]

Just to add to the barrage of leaking reports--I've got one tank and my buddy has 2--all have the leaking issues and have been shelved for the time being.

I tied all the "fix" methods, nothing worked for more than 1/2 a tank and my coils are the newer 2 oring ones.

 

[Tom Waznis]

Juice condenses in the air slot like crazy. I might try taking out the little spitback thing any see if it any better.

 

[RiceRide]

I took out the spitback as well but it has nothing to do with the leaking. I personally love the flavour but this thing leaks like crazy...

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk