City of Poway CA considers defining vaping as smoking - Tues meeting (cross posted)

Discussion in 'Legislation News' started by Roger_Lafayette, Jan 31, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. Roger_Lafayette

    Roger_Lafayette Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Location:
    Moved On
    City of Poway considers defining vaping as smoking for purposes of their Clean Air ord. It's not clear if this would also ban outdoor vaping in parks, etc.:

    m . utsandiego . com/news/2014/jan/31/tp-poway-may-join-cities-snuffing-e-cigarettes

    If you go to the meeting, you might want to be prepared to meet this guy: www . pomeradonews .com/2014/01/31/lippman-medical-truths-concerning-e-cigarettes-and-hookahs
     
  2. DrMA

    DrMA Ultra Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Location:
    Seattle area
    That second link should be broken, IMO. there's nothing but lies, deceit, and abolitionist propaganda in what that guy says.
     
  3. rothenbj

    rothenbj Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Location:
    Green Lane, Pa
    That second link should be commented on.
     
  4. Roger_Lafayette

    Roger_Lafayette Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Location:
    Moved On
  5. 2coils

    2coils Ultra Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey
    IMO any junk articles should be broken as to not give any extra google joose!!!
     
  6. 2coils

    2coils Ultra Member Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Location:
    New Jersey
    The last thing we want IMO is to be spoken in the same breath as hookah. Not good either, as we all know the two are not even close to being similar.
     
  7. Roger_Lafayette

    Roger_Lafayette Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    Location:
    Moved On
    I decided to give your POV the benefit of the doubt. That said, there's an argument for preserving junk-laden links in certain other forums besides media, which may be why the policy isn't posted/enforced site-wide.
     
  8. classwife

    classwife Ask The Vets Manager
    Asst Classifieds Mgr
    Admin Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Location:
    Wesley Chapel, Florida

    This actually applies to anywhere in the Forum. Please break your links, thank you.

    http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/ecf-forum-rules/51178-forum-rules.html

    17. Linking to low-quality websites
    a. No links to low-quality websites are allowed. This means sites that are banned by search engines to a greater or lesser degree; websites that are rated poorly by safe-surf organizations; and sites that we rate as being of low quality. Such sites include but are not limited to those listed in banned sig links (see below).
    b. Posting live links [1] to propaganda against e-cigarettes, low-quality unresearched or slanted press articles, or materials containing deliberate attacks on e-cigarettes unsupportable by independent evidence, is not allowed. Links should be broken by placing spaces in the domain part of the URL, or any other method that prevents browsers or search engines seeing a link [2].

    [2] Search engines attribute a great deal of weight to ECF materials (it is called 'TrustRank'). If we link to a webpage, it is seen as a major vote for that page, by the search engines, and it will give that page additional pagerank and credibility. We do not want to support commercial paid-for propaganda and inaccurate or agenda-based journalism.
     
  9. dr g

    dr g Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Location:
    Paradise
    They are actually VERY similar in action however, there is a huge difference as far as risk, that being the presence of whole tobacco substrate and burning coal heat source. Vaping eliminates both of those.
     
  10. Eric A. Blair

    Eric A. Blair Senior Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Location:
    Democratic Peoples Republic of NJ
    That is what you are going to get everywhere e-cig laws are proposed: big Pharma funded front groups who are pimping themselves out for cash. They make six figures peddling lies, you don't expect them to take a real job at Walmart as a cashier do you?

    You can only hope that the elected public servants you are talking to are just normal people who care about their constituents. And not big Government junkies Who need future MSA tobacco settlement payments to pay for general state expenditures.
     
  11. Eric A. Blair

    Eric A. Blair Senior Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Location:
    Democratic Peoples Republic of NJ
    If you ever have to follow one of these special interest mouthpieces in a legislative hearing, you can always try the Vincent Laguardia Gambini defense from the movie "My Cousin Vinny". Sleep through the lies and ignore them and then say: "everything that guy just said is bull....! Thank you.":)
     
  12. Uma

    Uma Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Location:
    Calif
    The ALA made a huge statement about being extremely worried about the H pens addicting the newbies, but everyone knows the H pens are mostly found in Zero Nic plus the fact that nic, when chosen, is delivered at lower levels that is hard to become addicted to. By changing their scare tactics to the real H's, the water based H's, they confuse the issue, confuse the councils. Slick.
     
  13. zoiDman

    zoiDman My -0^10 = Nothing at All ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Location:
    So-Cal
  14. Uma

    Uma Vaping Master Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Location:
    Calif
    Follow the money....
     
  15. DrMA

    DrMA Ultra Member ECF Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Unanimous vote... Wow! Another city annexed to the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia :facepalm:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page