This has been my take as well. The spirit of this deeming is certainly draconian, and does not appear to be any level of compromise. In fact, in certain cases (like the fact that zero nicotine is in scope) it is actually worse than we originally supposed.I have not read the entire document but after reading and skimming 200+ pages or so it seems the FDA indeed has deaf ears when it comes to our cause. Every point CASAA made has been violently rebutted or totally ignored. New rules were added. It does not feel like the document was written in the spirit of okay, maybe we can compromise on a few things.
It is worse than a DA overcharging a case to settle and plea out for lesser charges. It reads like extreme overkill. One poster said we have been bombed back to the stone age. I tend to agree. Keeping the faith is one thing. Reality is another. I am not giving up. None of should but this is a really bad day for vaping. Black Thursday.
Short of a lawsuit, which I'm struggling to see the grounds for (the FDA is operating well within the law, and under the "suggestion" of Judge Leon in the Sottera case that these are tobacco products and not medical devices), the main hope we have at this point is the Cole amendment or HR 2058 to move the grandfather date forward.
There are people a lot smarter than me in the law, and I'm sure CASAA has a small team of lawyers going over this with a fine-tooth comb. I hope I'm wrong. But, you are right, this deeming document is damn nasty.
Somebody in a previous post mentioned the NRA and gun lobby. Advocates, like Dimitri, have been pushing vendors to pay for a formal lobbyist for the past several years. Crickets.