I don't think it SHOULDN'T have been an emergency, regardless of what was venting/smoking actually, and I'd be surprised if that happened in any US airport and the results wouldn't have been the same. Evacuation of an area where something looks like it may be a *bomb* should result in the same precautions, wherever. Had the suitcase not been unattended, at least the person could have informed authorities WHAT it was and how to handle it more swiftly, but since it was unattended (who does that anymore?) the response wasn't over the top in any way, IMO.
I'm going to agree that many European nations have had to deal with terrorism a lot more than the US, though. IRA bombings have been terrible. I'd be happy if the US emulated Europe more in their caution, but it is easier to grow complacent about some stuff, depending on where you live. I'm not even faulting the media on this one or the official response, I just believe it to be a shame that someone either "fled" their problem (I'm sorry, if I had an e-cig venting or smoking, I would not LEAVE though I might step back from the suitcase, and I'd claim responsibility) or left something that had the possibility of explosion unattended to begin with. Even if I'd get fined, or some other thing happened, I wouldn't leave my carry-ons ANYWHERE, I take them into the bathroom with me if I'm alone, I don't even ask someone to watch my stuff, etc. etc. I think it's a shame it happened, but the response was perfectly justified and I'd hope that if someone travelling here did the same thing, the same precautions would be taken, in fact. I'm not surprised by it, and I think it's a shame, and I do hope they figure out whose person's suitcase that was as it's made perfectly clear with relevant signage not to leave bags unattended anywhere, though I haven't taken a train in a while, I'm not sure if they have the same policies as airports, but they *should*.
Anna
Anna