Damn, when I was a kid in England you got your fish and chips wrapped in newspaper. Servers in chippies could take a sheet of newspaper and fold it into a cone shape faster than the eye could follow. As far as I know nobody ever died of newspaper poisoning, but someone decided it wasn't sanitary so now fish and chips have to come in proper approved wrapping material.
Last I was there they were still serving in newspaper. It was hell trying to read the news after the oil soaked in, but the coastal views made it so worth it.
So want to move there.
Do not forget the fact that nicotine is a drug. We are using this hardware to deliver a drug to our bloodstream via our mucous membranes.
As drugs go, it's pretty darned innocuous, but a drug nonetheless. While the toxicity of nicotine has been proven to be at least one order of magnitude less than was previously published, and there is mounting evidence that it lacks addictive potential when separated from other compounds in tobacco, it nonetheless falls within their wheelhouse.
FDA also has authority over medical devices. If the tobacco deeming weren't the mechanism of choice, then a medical device deeming would be. That's why you don't see the hardware advertised by manufacturers as a smoking cessation product. However, there would be a legit legal argument to be made based on universal (or nearly so) common perception that any reasonable person would expect this product to help quit smoking.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like living in a nanny state either, I just think this discussion is a wasteful barking up of the wrong tree. The jurisdiction issue is one we cannot hope to win.
I say this respectively, not as a challenge. Nicotine is a drug, so is caffeine. They don’t regulate coffee or coffeepots. Caffeine-“laced” soda is sold to children in school vending machines. Caffeine and nicotine are very similar. There was a study done, perhaps a year ago, that showed something like 44% of UK doctors thought nicotine was a carcinogen, more than that in Sweden. Thank you ANTZ propaganda.
Found it:
The survey findings show that a substantial proportion of GPs (40%) believe nicotine to be the first or second riskiest component of cigarettes, incorrectly identifying it as more harmful than smoke. Many (44% UK, 56% Sweden) also wrongly believe that nicotine in tobacco products is associated with cancer, while 15% in the UK and 22% in Sweden believe the same for pharmaceutical nicotine.
A survey of GPs reveals that many identify nicotine as a harmful cigarette-smoke component
Barking up the wrong tree isn’t a problem, getting people to bark up every tree is the problem. What has been predicted to come down from the FDA isn’t going to hurt “us” so much as those that are still unaware or those that haven’t tried/found vaping yet. We need to bark our butts off for them.
I don’t think the jurisdiction issue will do us any good either, money (taxes and bribes) speak louder than words. The world is infuriated by terrorists (rightly so, I am at the head of the line on that), but not on the silent killers (I’m at the head of the line there also) like BT, BP and Big Health Insurance companies.
May they all rot in hell (said without apology or guilt
).