I'm curious about this. Should we be offended by the gendering of PVs that seem to assume that the primary concern of lady vapers is having sparkling pink "elegant" and "ladylike" vapes instead of ones that deliver good throat hits and a charge that lasts all day? Or do you see this as good way to market to introduce vaping to women that might be put off by a bulky mod?
Examples:
Shop For Vapor Cigarettes from Vapor Couture
Luli electronic cigarettes - French Vanilla, Bubblegum and Capaccino
I'm bursting with questions. When I bought my first DSE-109 I admit part of the choice was made because it seemed to match my laptop well (oddly enough my most recent Ego purchase purely by accident matches my iPhone and case.) I'm on the fence though when it comes to "classy" lady e-cigs, in sophisticated lady flavors-- I could see maybe dressing up on of my PVs to match a party dress, but I don't think I could justify buying one just for the looks.
Also, thoughts on the marketing of e-cigs as an appetite suppressant specifically towards women?
Most egregious example:
NutriCigs | Electronic Cigarette, Fortified Electronic Cigarettes
Is this an aping of big tobacco targeting women in the 1930s?
Examples:
Shop For Vapor Cigarettes from Vapor Couture
Luli electronic cigarettes - French Vanilla, Bubblegum and Capaccino
I'm bursting with questions. When I bought my first DSE-109 I admit part of the choice was made because it seemed to match my laptop well (oddly enough my most recent Ego purchase purely by accident matches my iPhone and case.) I'm on the fence though when it comes to "classy" lady e-cigs, in sophisticated lady flavors-- I could see maybe dressing up on of my PVs to match a party dress, but I don't think I could justify buying one just for the looks.
Also, thoughts on the marketing of e-cigs as an appetite suppressant specifically towards women?
Most egregious example:
NutriCigs | Electronic Cigarette, Fortified Electronic Cigarettes
Is this an aping of big tobacco targeting women in the 1930s?